#4, RE: Roses in Springtime
Posted by Luc on Oct-30-01 at 03:56 AM
In response to message #3
>>A cheap way to make a no content post into a minor content post >>(placement being more important then content for a "This Goes Here" >>post, which, given this board's reaction to previous Symphony >>installments, might be a good idea). > >See, now, this is exactly what I don't want to happen - people >getting locked into the mindset that there can only be a single thread >for the discussion of any given episode, instead of giving their own >questions and comments and whatever subthreads. If that doesn't get >done, then the single threads get longer and longer and longer until >they're completely unmanageable. > >So, basically, This DOESN'T Go Here, or at least not Only Here. Eh. I just know I prefer to have some clue that there's a new story, and that I dislike undescriptive Subjects. (Which this has rapidly evolved into.) >Oh, and as to your first question, I doubt you'll ever see that. I >think they're annoying enough on DVDs, let alone spliced into a piece >of prose, however THAT would work... MiSTing format, for example. Thanks Luc "Wondering how he eats and breathes and other science facts" French
|