>And that brings its OWN mess, what with the possibility/probability of
>things going FZARK at best and ker-BLAMMO at worst, what with the
>thing most THOROUGHLY not being made to accept New Widget X as a
>replacement. Less because it's a no-name, and more because Widget X
>gives the item 3000 Whatcha-ma-callit and it's VERY specifically not
>rated for more that 1750....but Widget X FITS in there.
>

"Did you read the specifications?"
"Hey, it fit--"
"Did. You. Read. The specs."
"Well, no."
"Then this falls under subparagraph (c). It isn't built to take that, you exceeded the limits, all resulting damages are your own fault. Including the warehouse."

Peter Eng
--
Insert humorous comment here.