#13, RE: Litcrits who squick, today on Oprah.
Posted by Shadowhavoc on Jan-31-02 at 01:35 AM
In response to message #10
>>>By >>>the end of "SoS2:7:Ceremony & Celebration", Kate and Juri have >>>apparently consummated their relationship. That just creeps me out. >>>Honestly. Couldn't they do it *between* stories? And for >>>balance, yes, the first encounters in UF1 creeped me out too. >> >>The fuck, man? Are you that easily squicked? I mean, it's not like the >>entire sequence of events was described in minute detail, in >>either situation. > >Yeah, now that you mention it, this did strike me as pretty funny. I >mean, I've always considered myself some what timid about >depicting the sex lives of my characters. When I wrote Exodus 2:4: >The Day the Universe Changed, I hesitated for some time wondering >whether to release it as it came out, but finally decided that I had >to - the dialogue that ran through it was too important to leave out, >and revamping the sequence to tame it down would have - if you'll >pardon the expression - emasculated it. So I left it, and fretted >about it. > >As it happens, I've got a couple of bits planned for later parts of >the Symphony that tread similar terrain. It comes with the >territory, I think - as I've already said (or tried to say, anyway), >love and sex, both connected and exclusive of each other, are critical >themes here, and there's no escaping them. Not for me, and (if you >keep reading) not for you. I'm a little uncomfortable with the notion >- I was raised in New England and there's part of my soul that will >always be Puritan no matter how the rest of me rails against it - but >I'm pressing on anyway because I think it's important, not >because I'm going for cheap thrills. > >So consider this fair warning: it won't end here. It's not a story >about sex, and I promise never to use the word "cum", but I'm >not going to shuffle these matters off screen, because > >a) that's narratively dumb - what am I supposed to do if I move it to >"between stories" as suggested, open the next part with "While we >weren't looking, something naughty happened"? > >b) Well, I've already covered b above, so I suppose I don't need to go >into it again, except to reiterate one more time: it's >important. > I've been reading mature (for lack of a better word) works since I was thirteen. Extreme amounts of swearing, bloodshed, violence, detailed torture scenes and whatnot; and I've got to say this: When the writers of EPU create certain images, yeah they have their limits (PG-13) that they set upon themselves, I just think they're doing it in, um, in a certain way that gets things across without becoming crass in the descriptions. I'm tempted to type an example, but I don't feel right doing that.Taste? Class? Style?--No that don't sound right, either.
|