>>2) Is dorothy fully functional? (I believe the answer is actually in
>>there, but considering someone using a full sentience as a
>>pleasure-slave makes my ears fold back, and I'm human)
>
>It's never addressed in the source material, and has been the subject
>of considerable debate within Big O fandom. For the UF
>version, the answer is "yes", although it's worth pointing out that
>Dorothy herself isn't entirely certain.

It's moments like these that I reconsider the idea of posting a comment my ex made about Dorothy and Roger.

I'm not going to say it, though. It just has to do with that full-functionality and Dorothy's precision of movement control.

And how NOT to crush Roger's skull.

I'm sure you can figure the rest out yourself.

--
Geoff Depew - Mephron
Haberdasher to Androids, Malakite of Lightning and Angel of Tech Support Professionals
(They won't give me LARTs, they say that's restricted to Michael.)