#0, Random Amusement
Posted by Astynax on Oct-19-20 at 01:51 PM
Apropos of nothing in particular, but this collection of images of ceremonial swords employed by the US Air Force simply demanded a wider audience.
|  | -={(Astynax)}=- "I could swear I had the sword in the second picture in a game at some point." |
|
#1, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by MuninsFire on Oct-19-20 at 04:23 PM
In response to message #0
Well those are goofy as all hell ain't they.( Speaking as a blacksmith? -Ew- )
#2, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by Matrix Dragon on Oct-19-20 at 04:50 PM
In response to message #0
Those belong in video games, and nowhere near a real military.Matrix Dragon, J. Random Nutter
#3, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by SpottedKitty on Oct-19-20 at 05:24 PM
In response to message #2
>Those belong in video games, and nowhere near a real military. I think a couple of them are from video games... -- Unable to save the day: File is read-only.
#4, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by StClair on Oct-20-20 at 00:39 AM
In response to message #2
>Those belong in video games, and nowhere near a real military. Well, given that we're talking about the Air Force... (feel free to suggest your own variation)
#9, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by Zemyla on Oct-23-20 at 12:07 PM
In response to message #4
"Fly me closer, I want to hit them with my sword."
#5, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by MoonEyes on Oct-20-20 at 03:42 PM
In response to message #0
Having been an utter sword-nerd since time immemorial, I offer you this:http://www.foxtail.nu/bjorn/fulaste.htm The page IS in Swedish, but the general idea of "Hideous/Silly swords" should sort of come through all the same. There's a whole set of pages, but since the site utilizes a "frame" layout, it's probably easier if you just add the numbers 2 through 7 just before the period. ...! Stoke Mandeville, Esq & The Victorian Ballsmiths "Nobody Want Verdigris-Covered Balls!"
#6, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by Astynax on Oct-20-20 at 04:41 PM
In response to message #5
>Having been an utter sword-nerd since time immemorial, I offer you >this: > >http://www.foxtail.nu/bjorn/fulaste.htm > >The page IS in Swedish, but the general idea of "Hideous/Silly swords" >should sort of come through all the same. >There's a whole set of pages, but since the site utilizes a "frame" >layout, it's probably easier if you just add the numbers 2 through 7 >just before the period. Heh, it's like someone decided to actually forge the art from a multitude of RPG sourcebooks. Though I suppose a few of them could qualify as 'merely impractical' rather than 'more dangerous the the wielder than their opponent'.
|  | -={(Astynax)}=- "Kobrakatana!" |
|
#7, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by Terminus Est on Oct-22-20 at 02:07 PM
In response to message #6
I'm not sure about the rest of them, but the one with the pinched bit in the middle of the blade seems to be designed with half-swording in mind. Why you'd make that feature into the blade instead of y'know... using a gauntlet? That bit's beyond me. Maybe the makers weren't into heavy armor?
#8, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by MoonEyes on Oct-22-20 at 08:07 PM
In response to message #7
This one? http://www.foxtail.nu/bjorn/images/barbarian2.jpg?xIt might've been a thing, but considering how far out the "waist" is, you'd need arms like an orangutan. Not to mention it's a significant weak-spot. At least you get a back-up knife for when the blade snaps. ...! Stoke Mandeville, Esq & The Victorian Ballsmiths "Nobody Want Verdigris-Covered Balls!"
#14, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by Terminus Est on Nov-01-20 at 06:54 PM
In response to message #8
Yeah, that one. It's the only one I see there that kind of makes sense - but as you noted, it has many very obvious design flaws. I don't think I'd trust that backup knife, either. It looks like it would fall off after one or two parries.
#10, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by BobSchroeck on Oct-28-20 at 02:01 PM
In response to message #5
>Having been an utter sword-nerd since time immemorial, I offer you >this: > >http://www.foxtail.nu/bjorn/fulaste.htm > >The page IS in Swedish, but the general idea of "Hideous/Silly swords" >should sort of come through all the same. My hat's off to Google Translate for such an excellent job of getting this guy's disgust across in English: > "In the same spirit, we have a bunch of stainless steel kitchen knives > from Spanish Marto, suitable for barbarian wannabes. It is difficult to > decide which is the ugliest, so the whole bundle must be included. I > suspect that the designer overdosed on shitty heavy metal and worse > barbarian films in the 80's… I can only imagine how snarky it is in the original Swedish... -- Bob ------------------- My race is pacifist and does not believe in war. We kill only out of personal spite.
#13, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by MoonEyes on Oct-30-20 at 06:26 AM
In response to message #10
That he as actually a pretty good translation, indeed. But yes, the snarkiness is high. "As your comment about the so-called Christmas katana sword, it is clear that you can associate gadgets with anything. For example, I have heard comments that Del Tin looks like overgrown cutlery. " Clearly from people who think that Christmas catanas are the most beautiful thing they have seen ;-) "As I said, taste is divided." Hellyeah. In good and bad taste ;-) ...! Stoke Mandeville, Esq & The Victorian Ballsmiths "Nobody Want Verdigris-Covered Balls!"
#11, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by trboturtle2 on Oct-28-20 at 10:44 PM
In response to message #0
Anyone here watch Forged in Fire? Contestants build blades and the final weapon is usually a weapon from history, which they then put through tests to see what the weapon can do. Watching what a sword or bladed weapon can do to a pig or hog carcass is sobering -- just because no one carries such weapons around these days doesn't mean they are any less lethal than they were centuries ago.....Craig
#12, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by Gryphon on Oct-28-20 at 10:55 PM
In response to message #11
>Watching what a sword or >bladed weapon can do to a pig or hog carcass is sobering -- just >because no one carries such weapons around these days doesn't mean >they are any less lethal than they were centuries ago..... "They did most of the good work with this. I'd like you to see what it does to a side of meat, because in hand-to-hand combat, that's all a man is." - James Burke, Connections: A Personal View of Change episode 03: "Distant Voices" (1979) --G. -><- Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/ zgryphon at that email service Google has Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
#15, RE: Random Amusement
Posted by MoonEyes on Dec-07-20 at 09:53 PM
In response to message #11
>just >because no one carries such weapons around these days doesn't mean >they are any less lethal than they were centuries ago..... Slightly unsettling fact: up until about 1965, the coppers around here still carried sabers rather than truncheons/nightsticks, and they really only stopped that because they were a pain to get in and out of patrol cars with. There's a deterrent for you. ...! Stoke Mandeville, Esq & The Victorian Ballsmiths "Nobody Want Verdigris-Covered Balls!"
|