>>>>I would, except that a) Generations sucked basically from the get-go
>>>
>>>Of course. It was odd numbered.
>>
>>The problem with that scheme (odd bad, even good) is that Star Trek IV
>>is a REALLY bad movie. It is marginally better than III, and V
>>makes everything look like a masterpiece, but IV is still a bad bad
>>movie.
>
>I happen to agree with you, but for some reason that is beyond me,
>alot of people seemed to like it.
>Whatever.

It is a bad movie. But it's watchably bad. Bad in a way that is, in spite of itself, fun. Like Super Atragon.

Blessed be.
Nathan Baxter