>That is neat.
>
>I understand why you used it (how else could you concisely describe
>that beat pattern?), but I briefly thought your phrase "5-3-5 rhythm"
>referred to time signature, which caused some confusion,
>since thirteen beats to a measure seemed deeply unlikely.

I suppose I could've called it a leitmotif, but, well, would that really have clarified the matter for most readers? :)

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.