>I admit that it took me an embarrassingly long time to figure out
>which markings you were referring to wrt the pointer that was out too
>far. For illustration purposes, it may have helped to have had them
>rotated around to be 'on screen' when showing how far it came out.

Yeah, I didn't really pay attention to the damper's position when I was taking the photo. In my defense, pictures are kind of a secondary concern when I'm doing the actual work, because there are only short windows when my hands are clean enough to be handling my phone, and sometimes I don't think of details or angles that would've been useful until I'm writing the thing up after the fact. In this case, I absolutely should've turned the engine until the degree marks on the damper were in shot--although they may not show up well on camera anyway. As you can probably tell by the brand marking that is in frame in that photo, they're pretty faint.

>Or maybe shown the old one you put back on for comparison? Unless it's
>not dry yet.

We painted those things at the very end of the session, so it wasn't ready. There's a decent view of it in one of the pictures I took today (writeup sometime this weekend), though again, it didn't occur to me to get a proper close-up. I'll try to remember to do that next time.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.