>No he may not of but still he made a good point so i thought i should
>fix it

Clearly you missed the point, sou I'll spell it out in very small words:

Do not give us ratings using your scoring system. Period.

As someone else pointed out, a scoring system that's intentionally skewed to give ratings in the bottom 10-20% of the total range is not really useful. Your breakdown of your score (out of a so-called 100) lists 37 out of a possible 67(?!?!?) points for positives, and a whopping 31 points for negatives. Since you subtracted 2 points for everything that you consider to be a plot hole in the first three chapters, and 1 point for anything you consider in bad taste, I expect your score to drop asymptotically to 0 as you read and keep assuming things.

I suggest you stick to something simpler, like thumbs up/down. Go ahead and use 2 if you like, I'm assuming you're not 1-handed.

Offsides

P.S. My apologies to the rest of the forum for making him spell out his ridiculous scoring system.

[...] in order to be a realist you must believe in miracles.
-- David Ben Gurion
EPU RCW #π
#include <stdsig.h>