#9, RE: Titanic II to be built
Posted by BeardedFerret on Mar-02-13 at 02:07 AM
In response to message #7
>>I'm not convinced "investors fail to show much interest" can really be >>classified as unforeseen, particularly in an age when the >>economy is in freefall, cruise ships are in disrepute, and there's >>been very little call for ocean liners (n.b. which are not the >>same thing as cruise ships) since 1958. > >Yeah, these crazy nutters always pop up just as the economy is either >on the precipice or in the process of mimicking the Titanic's death >plunge, when investors are keeping a stranglehold on their money, and >trying to sell folks on the idea of recreating one of the world's >greatest maritime disasters. > >Oh the other hand, there apparently is nobody in a rush to rebuild the >Hindenburg. Your economy's in trouble, but we survived the GFC pretty well (thanks largely, as alluded to below, to some incredibly profitable mining ventures, of which Clive Palmer is a major beneficiary). And China, who are building the thing, are doing pretty nicely as well. Basically we have the resources, we have the technology...
|