Gryphon wrote in another forum:

>>>> I should try to find some size charts for Star Wars...I
>>>>wonder long a star destroyer really is.
>
>>Just to be pedantic... :)
>
>Anybody who starts or participates in a flamewar about this
>will lose his account. I'm not kidding. I've had a bellyful of
>spaceship-size arguments and I'm not putting up with another
>one.
>
>--G.

Perhaps a new forum rule is called for.

I propose:

"DO NOT DISCUSS OR ARGUE ABOUT RELATIVE SPACESHIP SIZES. UNDERSTOOD?"

(Length is designed to fit in with the other Forum Rules.)

Thanks
Luc "Trivial" French

Not to start anything. No offense intended. Not to feed a troll. Please pardon my being terse.

Feel free to add your own forum disclaimer up there, but anyone who doesn't already know that from posting, reading, or lurking here really shouldn't *BE* here, should they? The staff has said plenty of things -- "Don't investigate so closely." "It's a space opera, stop nitpicking." -- that already, clearly state that petty arguments of that type aren't welcomed here.

Again, not to start anything, and my tolerance for all things not said by me is way off today, but as a random poster, that rule seems a bit redundant. That is, though, just me.

Static-Pulse
6E65 7665 7267 726F 7065 6173 6C65 6570
696E 676D 7573 6500
http://www.darkbeast.com/

LAST EDITED ON 08-16-03 AT 11:49 AM (EDT)
 
>Perhaps a new forum rule is called for.

Ah, poor Luc. Did not you know? There is NO! rule 6.

Mike Thedford
Dark Nation
Dictator at Large