#0, Is the UF Chronological Listing broken?
Posted by simonz on Aug-25-08 at 04:44 PM
I can't seem to get to it. Is it just me? -Simonz
#1, RE: Is the UF Chronological Listing broken?
Posted by Sofaspud on Aug-25-08 at 04:49 PM
In response to message #0
Not just you, it appears. I don't have the ability to verify, but the behavior is suggesting a zero-byte filesize on 'chron.html'.Probably some silly glitch during the transfer. --sofaspud
--
#2, RE: Is the UF Chronological Listing broken?
Posted by Gryphon on Aug-25-08 at 05:10 PM
In response to message #1
>Not just you, it appears. I don't have the ability to verify, but the
>behavior is suggesting a zero-byte filesize on 'chron.html'. No, it's there, in all its unwieldy, crockily-marked-up glory: -rw-rw-r-- 1 REDACTED REDACTED 37033 Aug 20 23:07 chron.html More likely the new, vaguely modern httpd doesn't like something about the way it's marked up and/or scripted. --G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Admin
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
#3, RE: Is the UF Chronological Listing broken?
Posted by donnerjack on Aug-25-08 at 05:28 PM
In response to message #2
Sorted, there was a typo or something in there. Or my Sed Fu horked it in a really, really specific way somehow.
|