[ EPU Foyer ] [ Lab and Grill ] [ Bonus Theater!! ] [ Rhetorical Questions ] [ CSRANTronix ] [ GNDN ] [ Subterranean Vault ] [ Discussion Forum ] [ Gun of the Week ]

Eyrie Productions, Unlimited

Subject: "BattleTech, Some More"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy    
Conferences Games Topic #132
Reading Topic #132
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-08-18, 01:15 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"BattleTech, Some More"
 
   New threads are still free!

Anyway, I'm not as big an RWBY fan as, e.g., Philip, but I still kind of wish for a mod that changes Yang into Yang, just because that would be funny.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-08-18 1
  RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-08-18 2
     RE: BattleTech, Some More Bad Moon May-08-18 3
     RE: BattleTech, Some More eriktown May-08-18 4
         RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-08-18 5
             RE: BattleTech, Some More Mercutio May-08-18 6
                 RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-10-18 13
                     RE: BattleTech, Some More Mercutio May-10-18 18
                         RE: BattleTech, Some More trboturtle2 May-11-18 19
  RE: BattleTech, Some More Mercutio May-08-18 7
  RE: BattleTech, Some More Matrix Dragon May-09-18 8
     RE: BattleTech, Some More Trscroggs May-09-18 9
         RE: BattleTech, Some More Arashi May-09-18 10
         RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-09-18 11
         RE: BattleTech, Some More drakensis May-10-18 12
             RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-10-18 14
                 RE: BattleTech, Some More Bad Moon May-10-18 17
  RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-10-18 15
     RE: BattleTech, Some More Peter Eng May-10-18 16
     RE: BattleTech, Some More Mercutio May-16-18 25
         RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-17-18 33
             RE: BattleTech, Some More Meridias May-18-18 34
             RE: BattleTech, Some More Trscroggs May-18-18 35
             RE: BattleTech, Some More trboturtle2 May-18-18 37
                 RE: BattleTech, Some More Mephronmoderator May-21-18 52
                     RE: BattleTech, Some More BobSchroeck May-27-18 53
  RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-12-18 20
     RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-19-18 43
  RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-12-18 21
     RE: BattleTech, Some More Matrix Dragon May-12-18 22
         RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-12-18 23
  RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-16-18 24
     RE: BattleTech, Some More Pasha May-16-18 26
         RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-16-18 27
             RE: BattleTech, Some More Pasha May-16-18 28
     RE: BattleTech, Some More Bad Moon May-17-18 30
  RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-16-18 29
     RE: BattleTech, Some More Nova Floresca May-17-18 31
     RE: BattleTech, Some More Nathan May-17-18 32
         RE: BattleTech, Some More Gryphonadmin May-19-18 44
             RE: BattleTech, Some More Matrix Dragon May-20-18 48
                 RE: BattleTech, Some More Trscroggs May-21-18 50
             RE: BattleTech, Some More Mephronmoderator May-21-18 51
     RE: BattleTech, Some More trboturtle2 May-18-18 39
         RE: BattleTech, Some More trboturtle2 May-20-18 49
  Living Up to Its Name Gryphonadmin May-18-18 36
     RE: Living Up to Its Name trboturtle2 May-18-18 38
         RE: Living Up to Its Name Gryphonadmin May-18-18 40
         RE: Living Up to Its Name Bad Moon May-19-18 41
             RE: Living Up to Its Name Matrix Dragon May-19-18 42
                 RE: Living Up to Its Name Gryphonadmin May-19-18 46
                     RE: Living Up to Its Name Trscroggs May-30-18 57
                         RE: Living Up to Its Name MoonEyes Jun-01-18 63
             RE: Living Up to Its Name McFortner May-19-18 45
             RE: Living Up to Its Name trboturtle2 May-19-18 47
     RE: Living Up to Its Name BobSchroeck May-27-18 54
         RE: Living Up to Its Name Gryphonadmin May-28-18 55
             RE: Living Up to Its Name thorr_kan May-30-18 58
                 RE: Living Up to Its Name Gryphonadmin May-30-18 59
                     RE: Living Up to Its Name thorr_kan May-30-18 60
                         RE: Living Up to Its Name Gryphonadmin May-30-18 61
                             RE: Living Up to Its Name thorr_kan May-31-18 62
     RE: Living Up to Its Name Star Ranger4 May-29-18 56
         RE: Living Up to Its Name BobSchroeck Jul-21-18 64

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-08-18, 01:17 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #0
 
   Also, while I'm dropping silly asides, you can really tell BattleTech is from the '80s by all the StudlyCaps in the game's nomenclature, can't you? BattleMech, OmniMech, MechWarrior, DropShip, JumpShip, AeroSpace Fighter... I'm kind of surprised House Steiner doesn't rule an area of space called the Lyran CommonWealth. It would really fit the motif. :)

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-08-18, 01:50 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #0
 
   I miss a lot of things about MechWarrior 4 (like, to the point where I'm semi-seriously thinking about scraping together a 2002 PC to play it again), but I think the thing about it miss on the most regular basis is the PPC sound effect. Skreeyow! No other game's interpretation of the PPC is as satisfying.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Bad Moon
Member since Dec-17-02
308 posts
May-08-18, 03:41 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Bad%20Moon Click to send private message to Bad%20Moon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
3. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #2
 
   LAST EDITED ON May-08-18 AT 03:42 PM (EDT)
 

I'm still in Mediums land as Im taking my time to build up cash reserves/mech stable before going to the Big Leagues, but I really want to field a Steiner Recon Lance of four King Crabs.

Edit: Why did this get placed under this reply? I swore I replied to the main thread.

------
Oh God, it was me. I was the grognard all along.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
eriktown
Member since Jan-28-06
203 posts
May-08-18, 06:24 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail eriktown Click to send private message to eriktown Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #2
 
   There are posted instructions for how to crack and run it on a modern Windows 10 PC, if that's any more appealing than PC archaeology.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-08-18, 06:29 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #4
 
   >There are posted instructions for how to crack and run it on a modern
>Windows 10 PC, if that's any more appealing than PC archaeology.

I messed around with that for a while a few years ago (during that brief window when it was legit abandonware); couldn't get it to work at the time. Aspect ratios and whatnot, probably something to do with video drivers. I might give it another try once I'm finished with the colossal bibliography I'm on the hook for to finish off this ill-starred semester. For now, the new game will suffice.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Mercutio
Member since May-26-13
936 posts
May-08-18, 09:20 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Mercutio Click to send private message to Mercutio Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #5
 
   >>There are posted instructions for how to crack and run it on a modern
>>Windows 10 PC, if that's any more appealing than PC archaeology.
>
>I messed around with that for a while a few years ago (during that
>brief window when it was legit abandonware); couldn't get it to work
>at the time. Aspect ratios and whatnot, probably something to do with
>video drivers. I might give it another try once I'm finished with the
>colossal bibliography I'm on the hook for to finish off this
>ill-starred semester. For now, the new game will suffice.

Mechwarrior 5 is due out this year. That might scratch the itch without needing to do any archaeology at all.

-Merc
Keep Rat


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-10-18, 02:02 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #6
 
   >Mechwarrior 5 is due out this year. That might scratch the itch
>without needing to do any archaeology at all.

Maybe. Given that one of the things I miss is the Solaris arc, though, it's probably not going to be the same.

(And yes, I know Solaris is in MechWarrior Online now. That's really not the same.)

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Mercutio
Member since May-26-13
936 posts
May-10-18, 10:14 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Mercutio Click to send private message to Mercutio Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
18. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #13
 
   >>Mechwarrior 5 is due out this year. That might scratch the itch
>>without needing to do any archaeology at all.
>
>Maybe. Given that one of the things I miss is the Solaris arc,
>though, it's probably not going to be the same.

We all miss Duncan Fisher.

>(And yes, I know Solaris is in MechWarrior Online now. That's
>really not the same.)

MWO is okay, but it can't really DO what a structured single player campaign can.

-Merc
Keep Rat


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
trboturtle2
Member since Jul-4-09
156 posts
May-11-18, 01:29 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail trboturtle2 Click to send private message to trboturtle2 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
19. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #18
 
   >>>Mechwarrior 5 is due out this year. That might scratch the itch
>>>without needing to do any archaeology at all.
>>
>>Maybe. Given that one of the things I miss is the Solaris arc,
>>though, it's probably not going to be the same.
>
>We all miss Duncan Fisher.
>

He's on the MWO Solaris and he's not lost a step......

Craig

-----------------------------
Writer for BattleCorps.com
and
Battletech/Co-author of
Outcast Ops:
African Firestorm, Outcast
Ops: Red
Ice, Outcast Ops: Watchlist,
and the soon to be released
Outcast Ops: Shadow
Government. All around
semi-nice guy! Really!!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Mercutio
Member since May-26-13
936 posts
May-08-18, 09:33 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Mercutio Click to send private message to Mercutio Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #0
 
   >New threads are still free!
>
>Anyway, I'm not as big an RWBY fan as, e.g., Philip, but I
>still kind of wish for a mod that changes Yang into Yang, just because
>that would be funny.

"Yang, we need to talk."

"'sup boss?"

"Listen, I both understand and respect the company's hazing traditions. I was the FNG just three years ago, you got me good a few times."

"The quick-release function is the best part of my arm! ... wait, is this about Alex?"

"It's about Lord Madeira, yes. Look, Yang. He's our liaison officer. He is not, strictly speaking, a 'new guy.'"

"He's wearing a combination half-cape, half-scarf, boss! What am I supposed to do, just... just ignore that?"

"Those are bold words from a woman who rocks a snood."

"I make it work."

-Merc
Keep Rat


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Matrix Dragon
Charter Member
1749 posts
May-09-18, 08:38 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Matrix%20Dragon Click to send private message to Matrix%20Dragon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #0
 
   Thanks to a game crash, Poor Dead Dekker is alive again. However, I suspect he might remember the horrible circumstances of his death, as his killers head was promptly vaporized this time around.

And then on the next mission, he became the target of attention of several LRM carriers. I left him screaming under the barrage, walked into the kitchen to get a drink, came back and found him still getting the crap bombed out of him. Poor man's going to need serious therapy... And Yang's gonna need to clean out the Blackjacks cockpit with a pressure hose.

Matrix Dragon, J. Random Nutter


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Trscroggs
Member since Apr-26-16
41 posts
May-09-18, 11:53 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Trscroggs Click to send private message to Trscroggs Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #8
 
   I'm starting to suspect Dekker is coded to be a missile magnet.

I've had an SRM carrier ignore a perfectly open medium's back, that it could have hit without moving, to take a full move so it could unload its entire load into a then undamaged scout 'Mech's front, just because Dekker was driving it.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Arashi
Member since Mar-12-10
113 posts
May-09-18, 12:42 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Arashi Click to send private message to Arashi Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #9
 
   >I'm starting to suspect Dekker is coded to be a missile magnet.
>
>I've had an SRM carrier ignore a perfectly open medium's back,
>that it could have hit without moving, to take a full move so it could
>unload its entire load into a then undamaged scout 'Mech's front, just
>because Dekker was driving it.

Well you know, mercenaries wonder around, and make debts doing so.

Debts must be paid after all. Or Maybe Dekker's been sleeping with all of the younger sisters of every MechWarrior across the galaxy?

When in Danger, or in Doubt.
Run in circles, scream and shout.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-09-18, 01:13 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #9
 
   >I'm starting to suspect Dekker is coded to be a missile magnet.

Apparently saving Private Kowalski has become something of a cottage industry among the subset of players who like a self-imposed honor challenge, along with faux ironman runs and, hell, I don't know, probably somebody out there is trying to beat it without ever using lasers or some damn thing, gamers are feckin weird.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
drakensis
Member since Dec-20-06
332 posts
May-10-18, 00:47 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail drakensis Click to send private message to drakensis Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
12. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #9
 
   My own experience has been that Behemoth is the one with the bad habit - she's a headbanger.

Sure, she claims that she just keeps taking cockpit hits, but clearly she's just headbanging and whacks her neurohelmet against the back of the couch until she's concussed.

(Also Ringo may be clinically depressed. Or Russian... it's hard to tell sometimes.)

D.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-10-18, 02:06 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
14. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #12
 
   >Sure, she claims that she just keeps taking cockpit hits, but clearly
>she's just headbanging and whacks her neurohelmet against the back of
>the couch until she's concussed.

"If you are tired of Ukrainian hard house, you are tired of life."

Also: MacCrofton Industries just did the "unearth the Argo" mission, and I'm sad that we had to wreck the pirate's Quickdraw so bad we couldn't get it working again this time. Where the hell am I ever going to find two more cut-receiver Yugo Quickdraw parts kits way the hell out here?

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Bad Moon
Member since Dec-17-02
308 posts
May-10-18, 08:26 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Bad%20Moon Click to send private message to Bad%20Moon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
17. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #14
 
   Another victim of Behemoth's Foot of Justice :smug:

------
Oh God, it was me. I was the grognard all along.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-10-18, 12:31 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
15. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON May-12-18 AT 10:32 PM (EDT)
 
>Yeah, if you've got an AC/10, you really don't want LRMs. Slap an SRM
>on that sucker. You might end up dismounting it when you get a
>Centurion, tho, the most iconic AC/10 wielding BattleMech of
>all time.

Funnily enough, both of these things are exactly what happened, before I'd actually gotten around to reading this post. :) I was kind of bummed about having to reshuffle the Super Hawk again, since the weapons package I'd arrived at on it seemed to be working well, but on the other hand, I did also find a nice AC/5+ that does bonus critical damage, and Behemoth's gunnery isn't that bad at longer ranges any more, so we'll see how it goes.

(And, of course, since Yang is apparently doing all of this by himself, the Centurion won't be ready to go for like 40 days, but...)

(Also, am I the only one who feels obligated to name the free Centurion from the Argo mission Mastiff? Just me? Maybe my dad? OK.)

>BattleTech has always loved designing stock mechs that are sort of
>all-rounders, meant to engage at all range envelopes with at least
>SOMETHING. Like, take the Vindicator. PPC, LRM5, ML, SL. Or the
>Blackjack, with a pair of AC/2 and then a shitload of MLs.

In fairness to the Vindicator's designers, what else are you gonna do with half a ton? Machine guns need ammo, it's already carrying as many jump jets as it can support... I forget if the stock design is maxed on armor for its tonnage, so that might be an option, but generally, I agree that if you've got a spare half-ton and nothing much to do with it, might as well get a tiny bit more damage at close range.

That said, the accidental invention of the Lasercator (because the PPC got wrecked and we didn't have a spare) turned ours into a decent mid-to-close-range brawler. PPCs are impressive and all, but the humble Large Laser with its lack of a minimum range has always been my best friend in the energy weapon category. :)

Also, and this is an oddity of the computer game I've noticed over the last few days: I didn't much care for the Blackjack in the tabletop game, but apart from its tendency toward heat problems (especially in shitty environments like Desert and Lunar maps), I'm getting good results out of it here. The AC/2s in particular seem to be disproportionately effective against vehicles; Mac occasionally pops Scorpion tanks with a single long-range salvo, and I know they're only light tanks, but they must be heavily enough armored for that not to be down to straight damage output. It's like they have a higher chance to score critical hits on vehicles or something.

>The problem is that these generalist designs make a certain amount of
>sense in-universe but they're actually sometimes tooth-gnashingly
>frustrating to engage with as the player of a game, especially when
>you have a full lance of mechs and you want to build them into a
>synergistic team of asskickers whose whole is greater than the sum of
>its parts rather than just have a team of kinda meh generalists. You
>find yourself going "why is my long-range fire support mech wasting
>all this tonnage on close-range weaponry when it COULD have a second
>PPC or an upgraded LRM rack? I feel gimped."

Well, yeah, hence the OmniMech and its cheaty-as-fuck hardpoints, I assume. :)

(Mind you, I don't remember the original game being as militant about hardpoint types as this one is. I suppose it must have been, at least somewhat, because that's the whole point of the "Omni-" concept, IIRC, and why it was so obnoxiously cheaty-seeming when they dropped it in 1989 or whenever that was. But I don't remember it being that particular.)

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Peter Eng
Charter Member
1528 posts
May-10-18, 12:46 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Peter%20Eng Click to send private message to Peter%20Eng Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
16. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #15
 
   >The problem is that these generalist designs make a certain amount of
>sense in-universe but they're actually sometimes tooth-gnashingly
>frustrating to engage with as the player of a game, especially when
>you have a full lance of mechs and you want to build them into a
>synergistic team of asskickers whose whole is greater than the sum of
>its parts rather than just have a team of kinda meh generalists.
>

It's been a long time since I played the pencil-and-paper version, but I remember wanting a lance of two specialists and two generalists so I could switch tactics on the fly.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Mercutio
Member since May-26-13
936 posts
May-16-18, 01:20 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Mercutio Click to send private message to Mercutio Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
25. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #15
 
   >Well, yeah, hence the OmniMech and its cheaty-as-fuck hardpoints, I
>assume. :)
>
>(Mind you, I don't remember the original game being as militant about
>hardpoint types as this one is. I suppose it must have been, at least
>somewhat, because that's the whole point of the "Omni-" concept, IIRC,
>and why it was so obnoxiously cheaty-seeming when they dropped it in
>1989 or whenever that was. But I don't remember it being that
>particular.)

Actually? No.

The original game didn't have hardpoints. Like, at all, in any capacity. You could put almost anything anywhere (I think literally the only restriction might have been "jump jets cannot go in the arms;" aside from that, free for all) as long as there was space for it; you were only limited by the number of slots in any given location. You could even fiddle around with stuff like "I can get more slots in my arms by taking off the hands," and some equipment can spread from the arms into the torso."

But you could go nuts. LRM10s in your legs? Sure, if that floats your boat. REAR-MOUNTED LRM10s in your legs? Hey man, they wouldn't judge.

This is actually something of a bone of contention in the fanbase of the new game; some people are all "fuck hardpoints, I want to be able to work up a mech from scratch using a blank paper doll" and others are all "you can sit and spin, I don't want to deal with the kind of broke-ass shit that custom mech designers could bring to the tabletop."

Anyway.

The reason the OmniMech concept seemed cheaty is because it very specifically allowed you to reconfigure your mechs (to a degree; stuff like engine size and whatnot were fixed) before any given battle with them. That's a big deal if you're playing in, oh, say, a scenario or a tournament where you have to take the same lance into battle multiple times in a row, or where you're unaware of the mission specifics until just before go time.

In the context of the new game... imagine if, after arriving in orbit and getting your mission briefing, that Yang could just dismount the equipment pods off your mechs and install new ones with different loadouts in like thirty minutes instead of thirty days. You could swap back and forth between your AC/10 and AC/5 variants of the Shadow Hawk quickly and easily.

THAT'S OmniMechs. It wasn't about the hardpoints, it was about being able to back up a semi with an equipment pod and a cable hoist to your mechs in the field and do an in-place refit without needing a full-on mech bay and hundreds of man-hours.

-Merc
Keep Rat


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-17-18, 11:20 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
33. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #25
 
   LAST EDITED ON May-17-18 AT 11:22 PM (EDT)
 
>But you could go nuts. LRM10s in your legs? Sure, if that floats your
>boat. REAR-MOUNTED LRM10s in your legs? Hey man, they wouldn't judge.

I suspected as much, but I haven't got a copy of the original core rulebook handy, and for some reason 'Mech construction rules don't seem to be in the Compendium, so I couldn't check.

I seem to recall that one of my colleagues in our high school campaign built...

... OK, you remember the Missile Boat from TIE Fighter: Defender of the Empire? Like that, but with Small Lasers.

Like, all the Small Lasers that would fit on an Awesome.

In case any of you were wondering, that is a fuckton of Small Lasers. He could basically annihilate anything that came within three hexes of him. He'd just roll his dice over and over and over again and the enemy unit would just... go away.

But he couldn't harm anything four or more hexes away from him in any way.

>This is actually something of a bone of contention in the fanbase of
>the new game; some people are all "fuck hardpoints, I want to be able
>to work up a mech from scratch using a blank paper doll" and others
>are all "you can sit and spin, I don't want to deal with the kind of
>broke-ass shit that custom mech designers could bring to the
>tabletop."

Yeah, no, not with online multiplayer being a thing.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Meridias
Member since Jun-9-12
59 posts
May-18-18, 03:04 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Meridias Click to send private message to Meridias Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
34. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #33
 
   >In case any of you were wondering, that is a fuckton of Small
>Lasers. He could basically annihilate anything that came within three
>hexes of him. He'd just roll his dice over and over and over again
>and the enemy unit would just... go away.
>
>But he couldn't harm anything four or more hexes away from him in
>any way
.

(I know there has to have been something like above in a movie or tv show at SOME point but I'm tired and can't think of anything off the top of my head.)

"Oh, keep laughing you little punk. You WILL make a mistake. I WILL catch up to you and then I will *OWN* you."

*********************
Rock Is Dead. Long Live Paper And Scissors.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Trscroggs
Member since Apr-26-16
41 posts
May-18-18, 03:21 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Trscroggs Click to send private message to Trscroggs Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
35. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #33
 
   OmniMechs also had the in lore advantage of being rapidly repairable. You just pop the broken weapon out and plug in a new one.

>Like, all the Small Lasers that would fit on an Awesome.

>In case any of you were wondering, that is a fuckton of Small Lasers.
>He could basically annihilate anything that came within three hexes of him.
>He'd just roll his dice over and over and over again and the enemy unit would just... go away.

That's why MechWarrior Online introduced both hardpoints and ghost heat to the game (if you fire too many of the same weapon type simultaneously, you would gain additional heat above and beyond the heat the weapons generated individually.) Of course this was gamed in a number of different ways, including mounting just one of whatever short of what would cause ghost heat, or stagger-firing with one less weapon and firing the other set of weapons while the first cooled off.

That being said, the hardpoints do fit in lore-wise, as most 'Mechs have only relatively minor variations in the same tech era. (Or at least all the officially documented variants.)


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
trboturtle2
Member since Jul-4-09
156 posts
May-18-18, 09:44 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail trboturtle2 Click to send private message to trboturtle2 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
37. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #33
 
   I know one guy who had a design with an AC/20 mounted facing the rear.... Of course, we were running Rattlesnakes most of the time, and you didn't want those behind you, if you could help it.....

Craig
(I also designed a Mech for the Solaris VII Ishiyama battleground that had an AC/20 firing forward and another that fired to the rear.....)

-----------------------------
Writer for BattleCorps.com
and
Battletech/Co-author of
Outcast Ops:
African Firestorm, Outcast
Ops: Red
Ice, Outcast Ops: Watchlist,
and the soon to be released
Outcast Ops: Shadow
Government. All around
semi-nice guy! Really!!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Mephronmoderator
Charter Member
1783 posts
May-21-18, 11:40 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Mephron Click to send private message to Mephron Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
52. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #37
 
   >I know one guy who had a design with an AC/20 mounted facing the
>rear.... Of course, we were running Rattlesnakes most of the
>time, and you didn't want those behind you, if you could help it.....

Remember the MechWarrior pods?

I used to have a bunch of friends who'd visit NYC and we'd go to the MW stage just off Times Square, and blow each other the hell up.

One time for the shits of it, I went with a Blackjack. And one of the guys started chasing me in his big ol' mech, and I realized...

My Blackjack has rear-mounted lasers.

Sure, I was taking some damage, but boy was he surprised when I kneecapped his mech.

--
Geoff Depew - Darth Mephron
Haberdasher to Androids, Dark Lord of Sith Tech Support.
"And Remember! Google is your Friend!!"


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
BobSchroeck
Charter Member
2203 posts
May-27-18, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail BobSchroeck Click to send private message to BobSchroeck Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
53. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #52
 
   >Remember the MechWarrior pods?
>
>I used to have a bunch of friends who'd visit NYC and we'd go to the
>MW stage just off Times Square, and blow each other the hell up.

Damn, I wish that place was still there.

Say, Geoff, was it Josh and I who introduced you to it, or you who introduced us? I can't remember -- all I recall is that the three of us took a break from the anime convention we were attending at the Marriott Marquis to spend a couple hours there. (That was the convention where Zoner ran a fanfic panel...)

-- Bob
-------------------
My race is pacifist and does not believe in war. We kill only out of personal spite.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-12-18, 02:32 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
20. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #0
 
   "This snow reminds me of my childhood. I hated my childhood."

You just... you gotta love Medusa.

"Ooh, they really don't like me."

--G.
"What are those? Trees?"
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-19-18, 05:01 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
43. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #20
 
   >"This snow reminds me of my childhood. I hated my childhood."
>
>You just... you gotta love Medusa.

New favorite Medusa line, at the start of a mission on a polar map:

"Should've brought a coat..."

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-12-18, 10:34 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
21. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #0
 
   Phew. Finally got the Argo to play with.

No spoilers, though the discussion may lead to some if there is one: I wasn't too impressed with the plot twist in the mission leading up to that. It seemed a bit excessive. Too fridge-y.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Matrix Dragon
Charter Member
1749 posts
May-12-18, 11:36 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Matrix%20Dragon Click to send private message to Matrix%20Dragon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
22. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #21
 
   >No spoilers, though the discussion may lead to some if there is one: I
>wasn't too impressed with the plot twist in the mission leading up to
>that. It seemed a bit excessive. Too fridge-y.

Wasn't really needed either, given the events of the tutorial mission.

Matrix Dragon, J. Random Nutter


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-12-18, 11:40 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
23. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #22
 
   >>No spoilers, though the discussion may lead to some if there is one: I
>>wasn't too impressed with the plot twist in the mission leading up to
>>that. It seemed a bit excessive. Too fridge-y.
>
>Wasn't really needed either, given the events of the tutorial mission.

Mm. It feels like someone decided, "We need to make absolutely sure this is personal," but, well, they already did that, unless you're playing it as a stone-cold money-is-all-that-matters mercenary, in which case, this development still won't.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-16-18, 00:47 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
24. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #0
 
   Is it just me or is the Quickdraw just not a very good 'Mech?

Also, is it just me or is the "ammo dump" arc mission way harder than two skulls?

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Pasha
Charter Member
988 posts
May-16-18, 06:18 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Pasha Click to send private message to Pasha Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via ICQ  
26. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #24
 
   >Is it just me or is the Quickdraw just not a very good 'Mech?
>
>Also, is it just me or is the "ammo dump" arc mission way harder than
>two skulls?

I thought it was, until I stopped trying to not blow up any of the ammo dumps.

--
-Pasha
"Don't change the subject"
"Too slow, already did."


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-16-18, 06:23 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
27. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #26
 
   >>Also, is it just me or is the "ammo dump" arc mission way harder than
>>two skulls?
>
>I thought it was, until I stopped trying to not blow up any of the
>ammo dumps.

I wouldn't mind that, but nobody ever stands in the damn blast range hexes!

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Pasha
Charter Member
988 posts
May-16-18, 07:25 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Pasha Click to send private message to Pasha Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via ICQ  
28. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #27
 
   >>>Also, is it just me or is the "ammo dump" arc mission way harder than
>>>two skulls?
>>
>>I thought it was, until I stopped trying to not blow up any of the
>>ammo dumps.
>
>I wouldn't mind that, but nobody ever stands in the damn blast range
>hexes!

Hunh. I dropped the panther and the catapult and some other POS with like two mlaser shots before they were able to get properly on the field.

--
-Pasha
"Don't change the subject"
"Too slow, already did."


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Bad Moon
Member since Dec-17-02
308 posts
May-17-18, 00:39 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Bad%20Moon Click to send private message to Bad%20Moon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
30. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #24
 
   All mechs that are in the lowest bracket of their tonage kinda suck. Cicada's, Dragons, Quickdraws, Victors. They have have the disadvantage of their weight classes iniative order and also only five tons more space than the heaviest of the previous class. They also frequently have weird space for weapon tonnage cuz Battletech grogs are broke brained.

------
Oh God, it was me. I was the grognard all along.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-16-18, 07:52 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
29. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #0
 
   A Grasshopper?! Really? And yet there are no Warhammers or Marauders in the game?

Sigh.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Nova Floresca
Member since Sep-13-13
352 posts
May-17-18, 03:20 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Nova%20Floresca Click to send private message to Nova%20Floresca Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
31. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #29
 
   While I'd love to see a Marauder of any flavor in the game, it would have to come with a spawn tweak such that I could actually encounter one while it was still relevant. Yes, I'm talking about you, Mr. Catapult-shaped-stain on the underside of my 3rd King Crab's foot. Where were you 3 years ago when I needed you?

Then of course there's the unicornCataphract . . .

"This is probably a stupid question, but . . ."


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Nathan
Charter Member
1335 posts
May-17-18, 07:46 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Nathan Click to send private message to Nathan Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
32. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #29
 
   Blame Harmony Gold, and look forward to their final irrelevance in a couple of years at most.

No, seriously, look forward to it - the in-game models in this game are fairly direct ports of the MWO ones, so once the copyright trolls lose their leg to stand on, we can look forward to DLC.

Also, it is possible to mock up a Marauder layout using an Orion, but the result kind of sucks due to the differences in the way heat works and the ruthless way the AI zeroes in on your most weakly armored units.

-----
Iä! Iä! Moe fthagn!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-19-18, 05:06 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
44. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #32
 
   >Blame Harmony Gold

Those 'Mechs were already redesigned for another currently-extant game, though, as were the Archer and the Phoenix Hawk. And the names were never overlapping in the first place.

I guess I was thrown off by the fact that some of the other Reseen 'Mechs are in here, but upon reflection, they're all the Sun Fang Dougram ones. (Well, and the Locust was originally from, what, Crusher Joe, I think, along with the Galleon tank.)

Still, I was under the evidently mistaken impression that that had already been sorted out. I guess I should have known by now that as long as there's another nickel lying around someplace that one or the other side's lawyers haven't picked up yet, it'll never be.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Matrix Dragon
Charter Member
1749 posts
May-20-18, 04:03 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Matrix%20Dragon Click to send private message to Matrix%20Dragon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
48. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #44
 
   >Still, I was under the evidently mistaken impression that that had
>already been sorted out. I guess I should have known by now that as
>long as there's another nickel lying around someplace that one or the
>other side's lawyers haven't picked up yet, it'll never be.

About three days before the game came out, Harmony Gold lost yet another court case, and it looks like it's gone as badly for them as their clash with Hasbro over Jetfire a few years back. It wouldn't surprise me if rest of the Reseen show up in a patch or DLC very soon.

Matrix Dragon, J. Random Nutter


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Trscroggs
Member since Apr-26-16
41 posts
May-21-18, 08:34 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Trscroggs Click to send private message to Trscroggs Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
50. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #48
 
   Coincidentally, I was in a used book store this weekend and managed to pick up a used copy of the Technical Readout 3025. Not the revised, or the re-revised, the original 3025, filled with Unseen, Land/Air 'Mechs, and so many images that Harmony Gold desperately say "Mine" to (and with no legal paperwork to boot.)

I already owned a copy of the first revision of Technical Readout 3025, the one where they dropped all the Land/Air and the first round of copyrighted images, but this is an interesting addition even if I don't play much BattleTech.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Mephronmoderator
Charter Member
1783 posts
May-21-18, 09:03 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Mephron Click to send private message to Mephron Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
51. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #44
 
   >(Well, and the Locust was originally from,
>what, Crusher Joe, I think, along with the Galleon tank.)

Yup, that's right.

--
Geoff Depew - Darth Mephron
Haberdasher to Androids, Dark Lord of Sith Tech Support.
"And Remember! Google is your Friend!!"


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
trboturtle2
Member since Jul-4-09
156 posts
May-18-18, 09:54 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail trboturtle2 Click to send private message to trboturtle2 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
39. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #29
 
   >A Grasshopper?! Really? And yet there are no
>Warhammers or Marauders in the game?
>
>Sigh.
>
>--G.
>-><-
>Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
>Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
>zgryphon at that email service Google has
>Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.

Two words: Harmony Gold.

I won't go into deep comments about it, but HBS part of the case has been dismissed with prejudiced, and the case now hinges on whether or not HG has the IP rights to the Robotech/Battletech images. All I know for sure is there's a lot of paperwork being generated as both side do not look to be backing down...

Craig

-----------------------------
Writer for BattleCorps.com
and
Battletech/Co-author of
Outcast Ops:
African Firestorm, Outcast
Ops: Red
Ice, Outcast Ops: Watchlist,
and the soon to be released
Outcast Ops: Shadow
Government. All around
semi-nice guy! Really!!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
trboturtle2
Member since Jul-4-09
156 posts
May-20-18, 01:50 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail trboturtle2 Click to send private message to trboturtle2 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
49. "RE: BattleTech, Some More"
In response to message #39
 
   Harmony Gold vs. BattleTech – An Actual Lawyer Weighs In

This should help explain the situation as it now stands....

Craig

-----------------------------
Writer for BattleCorps.com
and
Battletech/Co-author of
Outcast Ops:
African Firestorm, Outcast
Ops: Red
Ice, Outcast Ops: Watchlist,
and the soon to be released
Outcast Ops: Shadow
Government. All around
semi-nice guy! Really!!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-18-18, 09:13 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
36. "Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #0
 
   Has anyone else here:

1) Had a Schrek PPC Carrier turn up on a mission;
2) Said "Oh, shit" when you saw what it was;
3) Out loud?

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
trboturtle2
Member since Jul-4-09
156 posts
May-18-18, 09:47 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail trboturtle2 Click to send private message to trboturtle2 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
38. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #36
 
   >Has anyone else here:
>
>1) Had a Schrek PPC Carrier turn up on a mission;
>2) Said "Oh, shit" when you saw what it was;
>3) Out loud?
>
>--G.
>-><-
>Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
>Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
>zgryphon at that email service Google has
>Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.

Yeah, also with the Demolisher and the SRM carrier.....

Craig

-----------------------------
Writer for BattleCorps.com
and
Battletech/Co-author of
Outcast Ops:
African Firestorm, Outcast
Ops: Red
Ice, Outcast Ops: Watchlist,
and the soon to be released
Outcast Ops: Shadow
Government. All around
semi-nice guy! Really!!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-18-18, 09:57 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
40. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #38
 
   >Yeah, also with the Demolisher and the SRM carrier.....

I haven't seen a Demolisher yet, but SRM Carriers can fuck right off.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Bad Moon
Member since Dec-17-02
308 posts
May-19-18, 00:04 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Bad%20Moon Click to send private message to Bad%20Moon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
41. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #38
 
   >>Has anyone else here:
>>
>>1) Had a Schrek PPC Carrier turn up on a mission;
>>2) Said "Oh, shit" when you saw what it was;
>>3) Out loud?
>>
>>--G.
>>-><-
>>Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
>>Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
>>zgryphon at that email service Google has
>>Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
>
>Yeah, also with the Demolisher and the SRM carrier.....
>
>Craig

SRMCarrier.vid

https://giant.gfycat.com/LimpingWanAmericanbittern.mp4

------
Oh God, it was me. I was the grognard all along.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Matrix Dragon
Charter Member
1749 posts
May-19-18, 04:26 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Matrix%20Dragon Click to send private message to Matrix%20Dragon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
42. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #41
 
  
>SRMCarrier.vid
>
>https://giant.gfycat.com/LimpingWanAmericanbittern.mp4

Yeah, I'm pretty sure I was making that face. "It's still shooting. It won't stop shooting. HOW IS IT STILL SHOOTING?!"

Matrix Dragon, J. Random Nutter


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-19-18, 05:14 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
46. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #42
 
   >Yeah, I'm pretty sure I was making that face. "It's still shooting. It
>won't stop shooting. HOW IS IT STILL SHOOTING?!"

The first time I targeted one, and I saw the weapon list on the righthand side of the target info screen...

SRM6
SRM6
SRM6
SRM6
SRM6
SRM6
SRM6
SRM6
SRM6
SRM6

I knew at least one of my guys was about to have a rough day at the office.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Trscroggs
Member since Apr-26-16
41 posts
May-30-18, 10:54 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Trscroggs Click to send private message to Trscroggs Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
57. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #46
 
   LAST EDITED ON May-30-18 AT 01:54 PM (EDT)
 
The first mission one of these showed up was when I realized I had advanced the difficulty too far, too fast, and I had to restart.

Well that and it's
LRM20
LRM20
LRM20

brother who was hiding over a hill and using the rest of the units on the map as spotters.

Two Assault missile carriers, their two Heavy spotters, and then their backup of SRM Locus pack were just two much for my team of mid-tier mediums. Two of my 'mech were straight up stripped of all parts but the head when they fell over and another was injury killed thanks to a head shot, losing a side torso, and then falling over.


Edit: Incidentally, what video was the clip pulled from, I'd love to hear that one with sound.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
MoonEyes
Member since Jun-29-03
831 posts
Jun-01-18, 07:09 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail MoonEyes Click to send private message to MoonEyes Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
63. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #57
 
  
>Edit: Incidentally, what video was the clip pulled from, I'd love to
>hear that one with sound.

CohhCarnage let's play BattleTech pre-release, video nr 22, 24 minutes and 40 seconds in, approximately(yes, I went to find out).

Or, to make it easier, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69FIsIIj5CQ&t=1480s


...!
Stoke Mandeville, Esq & The Victorian Ballsmiths
"Nobody Want Verdigris-Covered Balls!"


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
McFortner
Charter Member
479 posts
May-19-18, 05:13 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail McFortner Click to send private message to McFortner Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via ICQ  
45. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #41
 
  
>
>SRMCarrier.vid
>
>https://giant.gfycat.com/LimpingWanAmericanbittern.mp4

To quote X from The Revolution Will Be Televised, "When I get up, I'm gonna throw you a beating."


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
trboturtle2
Member since Jul-4-09
156 posts
May-19-18, 06:15 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail trboturtle2 Click to send private message to trboturtle2 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
47. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #41
 
   >>>Has anyone else here:
>>>
>>>1) Had a Schrek PPC Carrier turn up on a mission;
>>>2) Said "Oh, shit" when you saw what it was;
>>>3) Out loud?
>>>
>>>--G.
>>>-><-
>>>Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
>>>Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
>>>zgryphon at that email service Google has
>>>Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
>>
>>Yeah, also with the Demolisher and the SRM carrier.....
>>
>>Craig
>
>SRMCarrier.vid
>
>https://giant.gfycat.com/LimpingWanAmericanbittern.mp4
>
>------
>Oh God, it was me. I was the grognard all along.

Yeah, Cohn. Watched him play the whole story game through. After that, SRM carriers became "Kill it with fire!" targets......

Craig

-----------------------------
Writer for BattleCorps.com
and
Battletech/Co-author of
Outcast Ops:
African Firestorm, Outcast
Ops: Red
Ice, Outcast Ops: Watchlist,
and the soon to be released
Outcast Ops: Shadow
Government. All around
semi-nice guy! Really!!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
BobSchroeck
Charter Member
2203 posts
May-27-18, 11:39 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail BobSchroeck Click to send private message to BobSchroeck Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
54. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #36
 
   LAST EDITED ON May-27-18 AT 11:41 PM (EDT)
 
>1) Had a Schrek PPC Carrier turn up on a mission;

A what? <grin>

-- Bob
(Who doesn't see his last name in very many non-ogre contexts these days)
-------------------
My race is pacifist and does not believe in war. We kill only out of personal spite.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-28-18, 00:05 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
55. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #54
 
   >>1) Had a Schrek PPC Carrier turn up on a mission;
>
>A what? <grin>

It's a tank with three particle cannons. Quite a nasty customer, even with the BT system's strong bias against vehicles.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
thorr_kan
Member since May-11-11
42 posts
May-30-18, 06:22 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail thorr_kan Click to send private message to thorr_kan Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
58. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #55
 
   Wasn't that statted up in an issue of Dragon Magazine back in the day?


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-30-18, 07:39 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
59. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #58
 
   >Wasn't that statted up in an issue of Dragon Magazine back in the day?

I don't remember Dragon ever doing anything with BattleTech. It was an in-house TSR publication in those days, so it would have been a bit odd for them to be spotlighting a FASA product. The Schrek might've debuted in BattleTechnology, which was a similar sort of magazine for BattleTech back then, but we didn't have a reliable source for BattleTechnology in my circle (ISTR its publication was pretty irregular compared with , which our regular DM had a subscription to), so I couldn't swear to it.

I remember the Schrek first from the old Technical Readout: 3026. I can't remember offhand if it's in CityTech (which originally introduced non-'Mech fighting vehicles to BattleTech, IIRC), but it wouldn't shock me.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
thorr_kan
Member since May-11-11
42 posts
May-30-18, 09:02 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail thorr_kan Click to send private message to thorr_kan Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
60. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #59
 
   Dragon did the (*VERY*) occasional Battletech article. The Shrek showed up in Dragon #114, p78, "Running Guns" by Margaret Weis and Kevin Stein, along with the Harrasser and Hetzer.

I've got the Dragon Magazine CD Archive; I looked up when I got home from work last night.

I remember this especially because of the following: "Notable Armor Units and Crews:
A private in the heavy armor unit of Halsten’s Brigade, Frederick
“"Sniper"” Jones earned his nickname by his skill in making
incredible shots. On at least three occasions when his Shreck has
been battling overwhelming ‘Mech forces, Jones has picked out a
commander and made a kill with a PPC shot to the head."

I never had a Dragon subscription back in the day. I remember borrowing this from my gaming cousin for a weekend at a cabin w/o power or water. I remember the sniper. I remember the three-barrel illustration. It was my only exposure to Battletech. That was over 30 years ago. How do I still remember that?


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
19580 posts
May-30-18, 09:41 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
61. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #60
 
   >Dragon did the (*VERY*) occasional Battletech article. The Shrek
>showed up in Dragon #114, p78, "Running Guns" by Margaret Weis and
>Kevin Stein, along with the Harrasser and Hetzer.

Huh! Weird. Well, I stand corrected, then.

>I remember the sniper. I remember the three-barrel
>illustration. It was my only exposure to Battletech. That was over
>30 years ago. How do I still remember that?

That kind of memory fragment is weird. I still have bizarrely clear memories of obscure science fiction stories I read about that long ago in Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine, to which my mother got me a subscription when I was 12 in the mistaken belief that magazine-caliber sci-fi was all-ages. The most prominent one I remember was George Alec Effinger's novelette Unferno, which is about a man who is mistakenly sent to Hell when he dies, and ends up in charge of the place because his happening to arrive at the exact moment a repentant Lucifer was leaving caused a fault in the automated bureaucracy.

Come to think of it, there may be an echo or two of this in the way the NXE movie played out.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
thorr_kan
Member since May-11-11
42 posts
May-31-18, 09:50 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail thorr_kan Click to send private message to thorr_kan Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
62. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #61
 
   >>Dragon did the (*VERY*) occasional Battletech article. The Shrek
>>showed up in Dragon #114, p78, "Running Guns" by Margaret Weis and
>>Kevin Stein, along with the Harrasser and Hetzer.
>
>Huh! Weird. Well, I stand corrected, then.

Very weird. Research turns up http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Dragon_Magazine, which shows 6 total BT Dragon articles, including campaign rules. Maybe light lunch reading today.

>>How do I still remember that?
>
>That kind of memory fragment is weird. I still have bizarrely clear
>memories of obscure science fiction stories I read about that long ago
>in Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine, to which my mother got me
>a subscription when I was 12 in the mistaken belief that
>magazine-caliber sci-fi was all-ages. The most prominent one I
>remember was George Alec Effinger's novelette Unferno, which is
>about a man who is mistakenly sent to Hell when he dies, and ends up
>in charge of the place because his happening to arrive at the exact
>moment a repentant Lucifer was leaving caused a fault in the automated
>bureaucracy.

You're not kidding about weird. I have a psych degree; I *know* how tricky memory can be. And it still surprises me. (Full Disclosure: Said degree is almost 25 years old. I am not, nor have I ever been, in practice. I have not, am not, and will not be performing any analysis on anybody, anywhere, anytime. I'm just tired of the looks I get when this inevitably comes out.)

I've got the same memories of Analog stories I read while rousting through my Pa's boxes of reading material in the basement. Amazing how many stories from the 70s and 80s stick with us.

>Come to think of it, there may be an echo or two of this in the way
>the NXE movie played out.

Heh. That makes some sense.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Star Ranger4
Charter Member
2242 posts
May-29-18, 11:32 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Star%20Ranger4 Click to send private message to Star%20Ranger4 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
56. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #36
 
   >Has anyone else here:
>
>1) Had a Schrek PPC Carrier turn up on a mission;
>2) Said "Oh, shit" when you saw what it was;
>3) Out loud?
>
Even funnier; When I had it first pop up in game it was "Bob, I want to have words with you" (Robert Schreck being an author I followed until I started having problems with his message board)

For even MORE sillyness (and tying in to the whole HG thing only tangentally) I've been having fun with the whole Argo part of the storyline since the American dub (back when they thought that anime needed to be 'cleaned' to be acceptable to American audiences) of Space Battleship Yamato, "Star Blazers" was one of my first exposures to the Genre. The one where they renamed Yamato... "ARGO"

So, I did find myself breaking out into the American version of the OP theme when I completed that mission; and, have been having sort of several related snippets running through my head.

"Sailing for the distant Star, of the Planet Cormandar,"
"Your pronouncing it wrong, Darius"
"It Rymes better this way, Muckraker"
"Oh?... Fighting Battles far and near, all to retake Coromandir"
"Chasing C-Bills far and Wide, Who knows what salvage we'll find?"
"Your a lousy composer, but a Darn good XO, Darius."


Of COURSE you wernt expecting it!
No One expects the FANNISH INQUISITION!
RCW# 86


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
BobSchroeck
Charter Member
2203 posts
Jul-21-18, 02:16 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail BobSchroeck Click to send private message to BobSchroeck Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
64. "RE: Living Up to Its Name"
In response to message #56
 
   >>Has anyone else here:
>>1) Had a Schrek PPC Carrier turn up on a mission;
>Even funnier; When I had it first pop up in game it was "Bob, I want
>to have words with you" (Robert Schreck being an author I followed
>until I started having problems with his message board)

Star, if you were having problems with the CAPTCHA, we got that straightened out some weeks back. If it was something else, please email me so we can fix it.

-- Bob
-------------------
My race is pacifist and does not believe in war. We kill only out of personal spite.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

[ YUM ] [ BIG ] [ ??!? ] [ RANT ] [ GNDN ] [ STORE ] [ FORUM ] GOTW ] [ VAULT ]

version 3.3 © 2001
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
Benjamin D. Hutchins
E P U (Colour)