[ EPU Foyer ] [ Lab and Grill ] [ Bonus Theater!! ] [ Rhetorical Questions ] [ CSRANTronix ] [ GNDN ] [ Subterranean Vault ] [ Discussion Forum ] [ Gun of the Week ]

Eyrie Productions, Unlimited

Subject: "Dorothy and Turing" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy    
Conferences Undocumented Features General Topic #217
Reading Topic #217
Wedge
Charter Member
Nov-10-01, 01:48 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Wedge Click to send private message to Wedge Click to add this user to your buddy list  
"Dorothy and Turing"
 
   Pulled from 'The Daggerdisc' thread:

>The fact that the effectiveness of the dorsal turret increased once
>Dorothy manned it is one of many points of data in her favor when it
>comes to her Turing application.

Is it safe to assume that the Corps monkey-wrenching of her application was subsequently de-monkey-wrenched once the smoke cleared? And how tied to Earth is the Turing Board anyway? I just assumed they were an independant entity, and I'd imagine they'd be a little tweaked upon finding out that a possible sentient's testing was messed with like that.

------------------------
"Mike Wazowski!"
------------------------
Chad Collier--...also assuming that any of the above is as yet answerable, of course.
Digital Bitch
J. Random VFX Company


  Printer-friendly page | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: Dorothy and Turing Gryphonadmin Nov-10-01 1
  RE: Dorothy and Turing Redneck Nov-10-01 2
     RE: Dorothy and Turing Star Ranger4 Nov-10-01 3
  RE: Dorothy and Turing Laudre Nov-10-01 4
     RE: Dorothy and Turing Griever Nov-10-01 5
         RE: Dorothy and Turing Shadowhavoc Nov-10-01 6
     RE: Dorothy and Turing Gryphonadmin Nov-10-01 7
         RE: Dorothy and Turing bparanial Nov-10-01 8
             RE: Dorothy and Turing Gryphonadmin Nov-10-01 9
             RE: Dorothy and Turing drakensisthered Nov-11-01 10
                 RE: Dorothy and Turing Jeffrey Nov-11-01 11
                     RE: Dorothy and Turing Gryphonadmin Nov-11-01 12
                         RE: Dorothy and Turing Redneck Nov-11-01 13
                             RE: Dorothy and Turing Laudre Nov-11-01 15
                     RE: Dorothy and Turing remandeteam Nov-11-01 17
                         RE: Dorothy and Turing Gryphonadmin Nov-11-01 18
                             RE: Dorothy and Turing Nathan Nov-11-01 19
         RE: Dorothy and Turing Laudre Nov-11-01 14
             RE: Dorothy and Turing Gryphonadmin Nov-11-01 16
                 RE: Dorothy and Turing StaticdashPulse Nov-11-01 20
                     RE: Dorothy and Turing Gryphonadmin Nov-11-01 21

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22395 posts
Nov-10-01, 02:05 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #0
 
   >Is it safe to assume that the Corps monkey-wrenching of her
>application was subsequently de-monkey-wrenched once the smoke
>cleared?

Yes. Her application was suspended by a legal writ from the Corps because the robot in question had become evidence in an ongoing criminal investigation. Which is perfectly legal, except that the investigation itself was illegal. Once the Corps and Earthforce drop the whole matter, it'll take the Turing Center's legal department a few hours to sort it out, and then she'll be back on the mail. She probably won't even miss her originally scheduled appointment. It's possible they may even bump it ahead to head off any further shenanigans.

>And how tied to Earth is the Turing Board anyway? I just
>assumed they were an independant entity, and I'd imagine they'd be a
>little tweaked upon finding out that a possible sentient's testing was
>messed with like that.

They are an independent body (sanctioned by the Federation and its close diplomatic contacts), and yes, they are going to be somewhat annoyed that the Corps filed a bogus injunction.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor in Chief, Netadmin
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/

-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Redneck
Charter Member
Nov-10-01, 02:07 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Redneck Click to send private message to Redneck Click to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #0
 
   >Pulled from 'The Daggerdisc' thread:
>
>>The fact that the effectiveness of the dorsal turret increased once
>>Dorothy manned it is one of many points of data in her favor when it
>>comes to her Turing application.
>
>Is it safe to assume that the Corps monkey-wrenching of her
>application was subsequently de-monkey-wrenched once the smoke
>cleared? And how tied to Earth is the Turing Board anyway? I just
>assumed they were an independant entity, and I'd imagine they'd be a
>little tweaked upon finding out that a possible sentient's testing was
>messed with like that.

Total guess here:

The Turing colony is a daughter colony of Planitia/Zeta Cygni which predates the WDF by about 30 years. It is thoroughly independent of Earth, or indeed of any other agency whatsoever, focusing all its attentions on the study of artificial intelligence and cyberlife. The Turing Board is, therefore, -the- authority on whether or not an artificial intelligence is sufficiently complex, or generates sufficient lifeforce, to be considered an independent living being.

Redneck


Red wizard needs money badly...
www.wlpcomics.com
White Lightning Productions - don't tell the Pope


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Star Ranger4
Charter Member
2483 posts
Nov-10-01, 03:28 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Star%20Ranger4 Click to send private message to Star%20Ranger4 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
3. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #2
 
   >Total guess here:
>
>The Turing colony is a daughter colony of Planitia/Zeta Cygni which
>predates the WDF by about 30 years. It is thoroughly independent of
>Earth, or indeed of any other agency whatsoever, focusing all its
>attentions on the study of artificial intelligence and cyberlife. The
>Turing Board is, therefore, -the- authority on whether or not an
>artificial intelligence is sufficiently complex, or generates
>sufficient lifeforce, to be considered an independent living being.
>

While the origins of the T III colony might be a guess, the rest of it isnt, Red... I believe everything but where they come from is stated in one of the stories... where R-type gets drug into an attack on the T-3 comp system. Its generally stated in there that they are THE final word about Hyper.Net, Ai, and other related subjects.

Even if they were originally settled from earth (and I doubt it. We know Dr. S. Sqrl, a Salusian, held a top spot there for at least a century) they'd not side with earth about this and risk loosing their reputation over something like this.

___________________

Vaughn doesn't know I exist. I guess this explains why the rest of reality keeps ignoring me as well. >_<

Of COURSE you wernt
expecting it!
No One expects the
FANNISH INQUISITION!

RCW# 86


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Laudre
Charter Member
Nov-10-01, 10:39 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Laudre Click to send private message to Laudre Click to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #0
 
   >And how tied to Earth is the Turing Board anyway? I just
>assumed they were an independant entity, and I'd imagine they'd be a
>little tweaked upon finding out that a possible sentient's testing was
>messed with like that.

This actually raises a question for me.

Okay, IIRC, most, if not all, galactic entities recognize a Turing-certified robot or android as an independent sentient, with all the rights and responsibilities thereof... but it strikes me that entirely mechanical races, such as the Cybertronians, might take a more liberal approach to defining sentience and independence. If they were to encounter Dorothy, or a robot or android of comparable complexity, intelligence, and development, would a UF Cybertronian regard her as independent, and sentient, or "property" as defined by pan-galactic law? I'd guess not; if that's the case, could they make her a citizen of Cybertron (possibly even an Autobot or a Decepticon) and thus an independent sentient?

-- Sean --
I'm not going to ask how much of "Cybertron Dreams" is still canon. It hurts my brain to deal with conflicting continuity.
http://www.thebrokenlink.org The Broken Link 4.0 is live!
"All tribal myths are true, for a given value of 'true'." -- Terry Pratchett
Follow my random thoughts
Follow my creative process


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Griever
Charter Member
Nov-10-01, 01:42 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Griever Click to send private message to Griever Click to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #4
 
   >>And how tied to Earth is the Turing Board anyway? I just
>>assumed they were an independant entity, and I'd imagine they'd be a
>>little tweaked upon finding out that a possible sentient's testing was
>>messed with like that.
>
>This actually raises a question for me.
>
>Okay, IIRC, most, if not all, galactic entities recognize a
>Turing-certified robot or android as an independent sentient, with all
>the rights and responsibilities thereof... but it strikes me that
>entirely mechanical races, such as the Cybertronians, might take a
>more liberal approach to defining sentience and independence. If they
>were to encounter Dorothy, or a robot or android of comparable
>complexity, intelligence, and development, would a UF
>Cybertronian regard her as independent, and sentient, or "property" as
>defined by pan-galactic law? I'd guess not; if that's the case, could
>they make her a citizen of Cybertron (possibly even an Autobot or a
>Decepticon) and thus an independent sentient?
>
>-- Sean --

Frankly , I'd be surprised if they DIDN'T do that . I mean , of
all the races out there , the Cybertronians must know best what it's
like to be regarded with prejudice , as _only_ a machine that
mimicks life , and also what an artificail lifeform that deserves being independent acts like . If they ever saw any artificial lifeform of the
likes of Dorothy I'm pretty sure they'd just dump all the regulations
in the bin and make said lifeform independent using any and all means neccesary (if said lifeform wanted it so , of course). And I'd pity any and all
who'd dare try to prove them wrong .

Am I making any sense here?

-Griever
"No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be; Am an attendant lord, one that will do To swell a progress, start a scene or two, Advise the prince; no doubt, an easy tool, Deferential, glad to be of use, Politic, cautious, and meticulous; Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse; At times, indeed, almost ridiculous-- Almost, at times, the Fool."



  Printer-friendly page | Top
Shadowhavoc
Charter Member
Nov-10-01, 01:57 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Shadowhavoc Click to send private message to Shadowhavoc Click to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #5
 
   >Frankly , I'd be surprised if they DIDN'T do that . I mean , of
>all the races out there , the Cybertronians must know best what it's
>like to be regarded with prejudice , as _only_ a machine that
>mimicks life , and also what an artificail lifeform that deserves
>being independent acts like . If they ever saw any artificial lifeform
>of the
>likes of Dorothy I'm pretty sure they'd just dump all the regulations
>in the bin and make said lifeform independent using any and all means
>neccesary (if said lifeform wanted it so , of course). And I'd pity
>any and all
>who'd dare try to prove them wrong .
>
>Am I making any sense here?

Yes.

It's a rare thing when I can make sense of something on the Eyrie forum.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22395 posts
Nov-10-01, 04:35 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #4
 
   >If they
>were to encounter Dorothy, or a robot or android of comparable
>complexity, intelligence, and development, would a UF
>Cybertronian regard her as independent, and sentient, or "property" as
>defined by pan-galactic law? I'd guess not; if that's the case, could
>they make her a citizen of Cybertron (possibly even an Autobot or a
>Decepticon) and thus an independent sentient?

Well, the Decepticons aren't big on adoption. Hell, in the old days, they didn't recognize each other as sentient lifeforms half the time. :)

As for the Autobots, they do have their own ideas, but they also tend to try and stick to the established rules - they like to make an effort at being good galactic citizens and the like. Odds are, unless there was some outright danger involved, they would try to stay out of the matter, at least officially. That's not to say they wouldn't want to get involved, but at that point it becomes kind of like a Starfleet crew gritting their teeth, sucking it up, and letting that planet full of hapless primitives get whaled on by the comet because the Prime Directive forbids them to intervene.

(Whereas the WDF would just waste the comet with the Reflex Cannon and give the primitives a new mythology. :)

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor in Chief, Netadmin
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/

-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
bparanial
Charter Member
Nov-10-01, 07:44 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail bparanial Click to send private message to bparanial Click to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #7
 
   >As for the Autobots, they do have their own ideas, but they also tend
>to try and stick to the established rules - they like to make an
>effort at being good galactic citizens and the like.

Though I would think that having one as a sponser would cause the
the Board to consider the application a little more carefully.


but at that point it becomes kind of like
>a Starfleet crew gritting their teeth, sucking it up, and letting that
>planet full of hapless primitives get whaled on by the comet because
>the Prime Directive forbids them to intervene.

I never liked the Prime Directive. My ST knowledge is a bit rusty,
but when I see it invoked, nine times out of time, it is usally an
excuse to avoid getting one's hands dirty.


>(Whereas the WDF would just waste the comet with the Reflex Cannon and
>give the primitives a new mythology. :)

May knock their culture for a loop, but at list their still alive
to have one.

Brad


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22395 posts
Nov-10-01, 07:49 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #8
 
   >I never liked the Prime Directive. My ST knowledge is a bit rusty,
>but when I see it invoked, nine times out of time, it is usally an
>excuse to avoid getting one's hands dirty.

It's well-intentioned, meant to prevent situations like the ones in The Omega Glory and Patterns of Force (both TOS episodes in which power-mad starship commanders bent less advanced planetary civilizations to their whims); on the other hand, it often leads to huge bummer situations like the one in Homeward (a TNG episode in which the crew of the Enterprise was forced by General Order #1 to loiter around in orbit and watch a whole planetful of primitive humanoids die as their atmosphere dissipated).

>>(Whereas the WDF would just waste the comet with the Reflex Cannon and
>>give the primitives a new mythology. :)
>
>May knock their culture for a loop, but at list their still alive
>to have one.

That's pretty much the WDF's philosophy too.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor in Chief, Netadmin
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/

-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
drakensisthered
Charter Member
Nov-11-01, 05:11 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail drakensisthered Click to send private message to drakensisthered Click to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #8
 
   >I never liked the Prime Directive. My ST knowledge is a bit rusty,
>but when I see it invoked, nine times out of time, it is usally an
>excuse to avoid getting one's hands dirty.

The Prime Directive is often mis-interprteted. To quote one of the books: "The Prime Directiive is not the words 'don't butt in' in mile high letters on the side of StarFleet HQ."

It applies only to races that have no knowledge of other sentient races - and to a lesser degree those that do but don't have ftl tech yet. The object is 'don't let them know we're around until they're ready to deal with us'. In the comet example, a StarFleet crew could blow up the comet - but they couldn't go down and let the natives know they did it, and they'd better not be seen.

Otherwise it's just a general respect for local laws etc.

In the Lensmen books the Arisians had a similar position, they had to minimise their contact with Civilisation or they'd cause it to collapse from an inferiority complex. Go figure.


drakensisthered

SHE'S the 'Pirate Killer,' 'Klingon Spooker,' 'Big Trouble in a Little Package,' 'She Who Must be Avoided,' and 'Go Around the Other Side of the Nebula.' I'm the dumb blonde comic relief.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Jeffrey
Charter Member
Nov-11-01, 06:39 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Jeffrey Click to send private message to Jeffrey Click to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #10
 
   >The Prime Directive is often mis-interprteted. To quote one of the
>books: "The Prime Directiive is not the words 'don't butt in' in mile
>high letters on the side of StarFleet HQ."
>
>It applies only to races that have no knowledge of other sentient
>races - and to a lesser degree those that do but don't have ftl tech
>yet. The object is 'don't let them know we're around until they're
>ready to deal with us'. In the comet example, a StarFleet crew could
>blow up the comet - but they couldn't go down and let the natives know
>they did it, and they'd better not be seen.
>

"The Prime Directive, Admiral, last time I checked, did not first appear on the wall of Starfleet Headquarters in flaming letters accompanied by a sepulchral voice intoning, 'Thou Shalt Not Butt In' ... The Prime Directive was created by men and women, no better or worse than any of us, and I respectfully submit that if our hands are so completely tied by it that we sit around impotently, then we have to seriously reconsider what the hell it is we're all about."
--Commander William T. Riker
Star Trek New Frontier Book One: House of Cards

Incidentally, a couple of friends and I were arguing over the concept (and validity) of the Zeroth Law of Robotics in a very similar argument. Wonder if that particular law applies to the robots of the UF universe.

----------------
Jeffrey McIntyre
"I actually liked ST: New Frontier. Wonder if I should be worried about myself..."


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22395 posts
Nov-11-01, 07:25 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
12. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #11
 
   >Incidentally, a couple of friends and I were arguing over the concept
>(and validity) of the Zeroth Law of Robotics in a very similar
>argument. Wonder if that particular law applies to the robots
>of the UF universe.

... the... Zeroth Law... of Robotics.

Uh-huh.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor in Chief, Netadmin
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/

-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Redneck
Charter Member
Nov-11-01, 07:47 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Redneck Click to send private message to Redneck Click to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #12
 
   >>Incidentally, a couple of friends and I were arguing over the concept
>>(and validity) of the Zeroth Law of Robotics in a very similar
>>argument. Wonder if that particular law applies to the robots
>>of the UF universe.
>
>... the... Zeroth Law... of Robotics.
>
>Uh-huh.

From Robots and Empire, and formulated by R. Daneel Olivaw, if memory serves:

A robot shall always act in the best interests of Humanity as a whole, regardless of the restrictions of the other Three Laws.

Or something like that. Basically, Asimov wanted Daneel to be the mysterious ruler of the Galaxy or somesuch.

Redneck (I -hated- that book)

Red wizard needs money badly...
www.wlpcomics.com
White Lightning Productions - don't tell the Pope


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Laudre
Charter Member
Nov-11-01, 07:57 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Laudre Click to send private message to Laudre Click to add this user to your buddy list  
15. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #13
 
   >From Robots and Empire, and formulated by R. Daneel Olivaw, if memory
>serves:
>
>A robot shall always act in the best interests of Humanity as a whole,
>regardless of the restrictions of the other Three Laws.

Basically, except that Olivaw didn't formulate it, Giskard did. Giskard just didn't have the capability to implement it. Following his one act of harming an individual in following the Zeroth Law, Giskard shut down, but not before communicating it to Olivaw, who set about orchestrating human history for the next ten thousand years or whatever in service to the Zeroth Law.

Baaah.

-- Sean --

http://www.thebrokenlink.org The Broken Link 4.0 is live!
"All tribal myths are true, for a given value of 'true'." -- Terry Pratchett
Follow my random thoughts
Follow my creative process


  Printer-friendly page | Top
remandeteam
Member since Jul-31-07
78 posts
Nov-11-01, 09:49 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail remande Click to send private message to remande Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
17. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #11
 
   >Incidentally, a couple of friends and I were arguing over the concept
>(and validity) of the Zeroth Law of Robotics in a very similar
>argument. Wonder if that particular law applies to the robots
>of the UF universe.
>
>----------------
>Jeffrey McIntyre

No particular law applies to the robots of the UF universe. Not the Three Laws, not the Zeroth Law, not the Laws of Zardon.

In Asimov's tales, US Robots and Mechanical Men wired the Three Laws into every positronic brain they made (with one exception; see I, Robot for that story). This was for marketing purposes; it allowed their customers to feel completely safe around those robots. They could easily have used their positronic technology without hardcoding the three laws into them. For the record, Asimov used the term "positronic" before realizing what a positron was; it is safe to assume that his robots brains' were not, in fact, made of antimatter. That would have changed the robots' behavior slightly (e.g. every one of them would run away from humanity and then detonate themselves safely).

Robots in UF are not made by any one entity, or with any one technology. Positronic (again, not antimatter) brains do exist; so do crystal matrices (such as Eve), the technology of Katsuhiro Stingray, and just plain old computer circuitry for droids. And that's not counting the "technologies" that handle the sentient robot races of UF, such as Cybertronians and Daleks.

Any of these cyberbrain technologies can be wired with arbitrary sets of laws. It is, therefore, possible to make an Asimovian buma if you cared to. I would not be surprised if some manufacturers did that, in order to sell their robots as "safer" than the competition.

--rR

--rR


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22395 posts
Nov-11-01, 09:53 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
18. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #17
 
   >For the record, Asimov used the
>term "positronic" before realizing what a positron was; it is safe to
>assume that his robots brains' were not, in fact, made of antimatter.

Years of watching Star Trek enabled me to get around that by assuming the presence of a polarized verteron matrix to prevent annihilatory events. :)

>the sentient robot races of UF, such as Cybertronians and Daleks.

FTR, Daleks aren't robots, they're biological organisms - nearly helpless and incapable of surviving or reproducing without mechanical assistance, admittedly, but biological organisms nonetheless. What we think of as a "Dalek" is actually just a Dalek's vehicle, rather like a small tank.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor in Chief, Netadmin
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/

-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Nathan
Charter Member
1384 posts
Nov-11-01, 10:22 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Nathan Click to send private message to Nathan Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
19. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #18
 
   LAST EDITED ON Nov-11-01 AT 10:24 PM (EST)

>>the sentient robot races of UF, such as Cybertronians and Daleks.
>
>FTR, Daleks aren't robots, they're biological organisms - nearly
>helpless and incapable of surviving or reproducing without mechanical
>assistance, admittedly, but biological organisms nonetheless. What we
>think of as a "Dalek" is actually just a Dalek's vehicle, rather like
>a small tank.

Vertical, One, Man In Tank. Silouette stats to be found at http://www.evilnet.net/~jhfong/Wormgears/Designs/vomit.html

Blessed be.
Nathan Baxter

-----
Iä! Iä! Moe fthagn!


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Laudre
Charter Member
Nov-11-01, 07:50 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Laudre Click to send private message to Laudre Click to add this user to your buddy list  
14. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #7
 
   >Well, the Decepticons aren't big on adoption. Hell, in the old days,
>they didn't recognize each other as sentient lifeforms half the
>time. :)
>
>As for the Autobots, they do have their own ideas, but they also tend
>to try and stick to the established rules - they like to make an
>effort at being good galactic citizens and the like.

Okay, another question: does the UF version of Cybertron have any factions besides the Autobots and the Decepticons and their subsets (Maximals, Predacons, et. al.)? And does being a citizen of Cybertron mandate joining one of them?

-- Sean --

http://www.thebrokenlink.org The Broken Link 4.0 is live!
"All tribal myths are true, for a given value of 'true'." -- Terry Pratchett
Follow my random thoughts
Follow my creative process


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22395 posts
Nov-11-01, 08:26 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
16. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #14
 
   >Okay, another question: does the UF version of Cybertron have any
>factions besides the Autobots and the Decepticons and their subsets
>(Maximals, Predacons, et. al.)?

In 2405, after several centuries of peace, there are Cybertronian civilians, citizens who don't belong to any particular group; the only particular "faction" is the Autobots, who serve as sort of a combination police/military/government for the planet and its holdings. (There isn't really a Maximal faction, per se; the Maximals we saw in Twilight are castaways from a parallel universe.)

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor in Chief, Netadmin
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/

-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
StaticdashPulse
Charter Member
553 posts
Nov-11-01, 11:14 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail StaticdashPulse Click to send private message to StaticdashPulse Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
20. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #16
 
   >In 2405, after several centuries of peace, there are Cybertronian
>civilians, citizens who don't belong to any particular group; the only
>particular "faction" is the Autobots, who serve as sort of a
>combination police/military/government for the planet and its
>holdings. (There isn't really a Maximal faction, per se; the Maximals
>we saw in Twilight are castaways from a parallel universe.)

The joys of Transwarp technology?

Static-Pulse
- the most impulsive post alive
DarkBeast.com


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22395 posts
Nov-11-01, 11:22 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
21. "RE: Dorothy and Turing"
In response to message #20
 
   >(There isn't really a Maximal faction, per se; the Maximals
>>we saw in Twilight are castaways from a parallel universe.)
>
>The joys of Transwarp technology?

Pretty much. (We'll have to come up with another name for it, it people will be confusing it with second-generation warp drive... :)

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor in Chief, Netadmin
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/

-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Printer-friendly page | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

[ YUM ] [ BIG ] [ ??!? ] [ RANT ] [ GNDN ] [ STORE ] [ FORUM ] GOTW ] [ VAULT ]

version 3.3 © 2001
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
Benjamin D. Hutchins
E P U (Colour)