[ EPU Foyer ] [ Lab and Grill ] [ Bonus Theater!! ] [ Rhetorical Questions ] [ CSRANTronix ] [ GNDN ] [ Subterranean Vault ] [ Discussion Forum ] [ Gun of the Week ]

Eyrie Productions, Unlimited

Subject: "Nebula Class Carrier?" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy    
Conferences Undocumented Features General Topic #369
Reading Topic #369
McFortner
Charter Member
562 posts
Dec-24-01, 01:49 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail McFortner Click to send private message to McFortner Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Nebula Class Carrier?"
 
   LAST EDITED ON Dec-24-01 AT 01:52 PM (EST)

I was looking at my copy of the Star Trek Encyclopedia and had a thought about the Nebula Class. Replace the sensor pod above the saucer section with a slightly larger version made to launch and retrieve fighters and the UFP/EA has a fairly large carrier. After all, if you accept the premise that the sensor pod is changable for different mission profiles, then it is not too big a leap to assume a sub-class of this ship being a carrier.

Michael

The Lovely Angels: When it absolutely, positively has to be destroyed overnight!

Michael C. Fortner
"Maxim 37: There is no such thing as "overkill".
There is only "open fire" and "I need to reload".


  Printer-friendly page | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: Nebula Class Carrier? Gryphonadmin Dec-24-01 1
     RE: Nebula Class Carrier? McFortner Dec-24-01 2
         RE: Nebula Class Carrier? zojojojo Dec-24-01 3
         RE: Nebula Class Carrier? Nathan Dec-24-01 4
             RE: Nebula Class Carrier? ejheckathorn Dec-24-01 5
         RE: Nebula Class Carrier? Croaker Dec-25-01 6
             RE: Nebula Class Carrier? Nathan Dec-25-01 7
             RE: Nebula Class Carrier? Griever Dec-25-01 8
                 RE: Nebula Class Carrier? Croaker Dec-25-01 9

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22420 posts
Dec-24-01, 02:06 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Nebula Class Carrier?"
In response to message #0
 
   >I was looking at my copy of the Star Trek Encyclopedia and had
>a thought about the Nebula Class. Replace the sensor pod above
>the saucer section with a slightly larger version made to launch and
>retrieve fighters and the UFP/EA has a fairly large carrier. After
>all, if you accept the premise that the sensor pod is changable for
>different mission profiles, then it is not too big a leap to assume a
>sub-class of this ship being a carrier.

Perhaps; but whatever you do to it, it's still uglier than a cat's asshole.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor in Chief, Netadmin
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/

-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
McFortner
Charter Member
562 posts
Dec-24-01, 02:24 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail McFortner Click to send private message to McFortner Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Nebula Class Carrier?"
In response to message #1
 
  
>Perhaps; but whatever you do to it, it's still uglier than a cat's
>asshole.

No argument there. But we havn't seen too many large carrier types in B5, and to me the sensor array on the Nebula looks like a carrier deck on a ST:TNG-type ship.

Of course, there is always the carriers from Space: Above and Beyond. Just a little too "clunky" looking for my taste. But they would work well with the general look of the B5 Universe ships.

Michael

The Lovely Angels: When it absolutely, positively has to be destroyed overnight!

Michael C. Fortner
"Maxim 37: There is no such thing as "overkill".
There is only "open fire" and "I need to reload".


  Printer-friendly page | Top
zojojojo
Charter Member
631 posts
Dec-24-01, 03:15 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail zojojojo Click to send private message to zojojojo Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
3. "RE: Nebula Class Carrier?"
In response to message #2
 
   >The Lovely Angels: When it absolutely, positively has
>to be destroyed overnight!

When it absolutely, possitively has to be accidentally blown up overnight!

-Z

---
We are Dyslexic of Borg. Your ass will be laminated.

-Z


---
Remember kids: guns make you stupid, duct tape makes you smart.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Nathan
Charter Member
1384 posts
Dec-24-01, 06:36 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Nathan Click to send private message to Nathan Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: Nebula Class Carrier?"
In response to message #2
 
   >Of course, there is always the carriers from Space: Above and
>Beyond
. Just a little too "clunky" looking for my taste. But
>they would work well with the general look of the B5 Universe ships.

IIRC, there's already a design for a B5 Earthforce carrier floating around someplace- I want to say that the site for the company that does the minatures for B5 Wars has a shot of it, but don't quote me on that.

Blessed be.
Nathan Baxter
(I _like_ that look.)

-----
Iä! Iä! Moe fthagn!


  Printer-friendly page | Top
ejheckathorn
Member since Aug-9-13
51 posts
Dec-24-01, 10:53 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail ejheckathorn Click to send private message to ejheckathorn Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: Nebula Class Carrier?"
In response to message #4
 
   >IIRC, there's already a design for a B5 Earthforce carrier floating
>around someplace- I want to say that the site for the company that
>does the minatures for B5 Wars has a shot of it, but don't quote me on
>that.

(Thread moved to General conference)

Eric J. Heckathorn
ericjh@stargate.net

Eric J. Heckathorn


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Croaker
Charter Member
639 posts
Dec-25-01, 00:01 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Croaker Click to send private message to Croaker Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: Nebula Class Carrier?"
In response to message #2
 
   >
>>Perhaps; but whatever you do to it, it's still uglier than a cat's
>>asshole.
>
>No argument there. But we havn't seen too many large carrier types in
>B5, and to me the sensor array on the Nebula looks like a
>carrier deck on a ST:TNG-type ship.
>

I've been involved with things on the Babylon 5 Wars boardgame (canonical material, reviewed by JMS or his representative) for years now, and believe me, there are lots of carriers.

The Earth Alliance sector flagships, as of the show era, are Poseidon-class supercarriers, equipped with advanced C3I technology and carrying 8 squadrons of Thunderbolt model Starfuries (96 planes in total). This is, I believe, the largest carrier currently fielded in the B5 universe; although the "Strike Cruiser" carrying 1-2 squadrons of fighters as organic support units are a very common sight - fielded by, among others, Earth, Narn, Centauri, Minbari, Brakiri, Cascor, Balosian, etc.

It's a very fun game. :)

>Of course, there is always the carriers from Space: Above and
>Beyond
. Just a little too "clunky" looking for my taste. But
>they would work well with the general look of the B5 Universe ships.

If you're going to go 'clunky and ugly', go Earth Alliance -- the flying bricks, complete with howitzers.

>
>Michael
>
>The Lovely Angels: When it absolutely, positively has
>to be destroyed overnight!


--
"Eat hot blazing photonic pulse fire, you alien invading human-abducting saucer-alien bastards!" -- Captain of EAS Bellerophon, firing on a Vree cruiser.

--
Croaker
RCW #mc2
"When in doubt, shoot something. Preferably the enemy."


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Nathan
Charter Member
1384 posts
Dec-25-01, 06:39 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Nathan Click to send private message to Nathan Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: Nebula Class Carrier?"
In response to message #6
 
   >I've been involved with things on the Babylon 5 Wars boardgame
>(canonical material, reviewed by JMS or his representative) for years
>now, and believe me, there are lots of carriers.

I keep waiting for some minor game house to come up with a mod of SC2 for B5W... Oh, that'll be a LOT of fun... ^_^

>>Of course, there is always the carriers from Space: Above and
>>Beyond
. Just a little too "clunky" looking for my taste. But
>>they would work well with the general look of the B5 Universe ships.
>
>If you're going to go 'clunky and ugly', go Earth Alliance -- the
>flying bricks, complete with howitzers.

One of the lesser things I've always like about that show was how each race had such an immediately identifieable 'style' to their naval architecture... And while my favorite SHIP may have been the Narn G'Quan, I've always loved Earthforce's STYLE.

*drool*

Blessed be.
Nathan Baxter
(Something about the rotational gravity section, I think...)

-----
Iä! Iä! Moe fthagn!


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Griever
Charter Member
Dec-25-01, 02:25 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Griever Click to send private message to Griever Click to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: Nebula Class Carrier?"
In response to message #6
 
   >If you're going to go 'clunky and ugly', go Earth Alliance -- the
>flying bricks, complete with howitzers.
>

Hmm , but while what we see in 'Space:Above and Beyond'
is just plain *ugly* (I mean , come on people , get some
style) Earthforce craft are IMO the kind of 'ugly' that
appeals to one's heart , like the A-10 or the YT-1300 .

But that's just my two 'grosze' .

-Griever
"No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be; Am an attendant lord, one that will do To swell a progress, start a scene or two, Advise the prince; no doubt, an easy tool, Deferential, glad to be of use, Politic, cautious, and meticulous; Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse; At times, indeed, almost ridiculous-- Almost, at times, the Fool."



  Printer-friendly page | Top
Croaker
Charter Member
639 posts
Dec-25-01, 02:41 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Croaker Click to send private message to Croaker Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: Nebula Class Carrier?"
In response to message #8
 
   >>If you're going to go 'clunky and ugly', go Earth Alliance -- the
>>flying bricks, complete with howitzers.
>>
>
>Hmm , but while what we see in 'Space:Above and Beyond'
>is just plain *ugly* (I mean , come on people , get some
>style) Earthforce craft are IMO the kind of 'ugly' that
>appeals to one's heart , like the A-10 or the YT-1300 .

Hell yeah. EA ships like the Nova DN, Olympus DD, Artemis FF, these are the soul of "cool through ugliness". I haven't seen the minis yet for the 'new generation' (post-Shadow-War) EA fleet, except for the Warlock, but that one looks like something a Fahrvergneugen-trained naval architect could love - slab-sided, big, bigger guns, BIGGER guns, and lots of cool detail.

>
>But that's just my two 'grosze' .

And that's my two grotzits. ;)

>
> -Griever
>"No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be; Am an attendant
>lord, one that will do To swell a progress, start a scene or two,
>Advise the prince; no doubt, an easy tool, Deferential, glad to be of
>use, Politic, cautious, and meticulous; Full of high sentence, but a
>bit obtuse; At times, indeed, almost ridiculous-- Almost, at times,
>the Fool."


--
"Eat hot blazing photonic pulse fire, you alien invading human-abducting saucer-alien bastards!" -- Captain of EAS Bellerophon, firing on a Vree cruiser.

--
Croaker
RCW #mc2
"When in doubt, shoot something. Preferably the enemy."


  Printer-friendly page | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

[ YUM ] [ BIG ] [ ??!? ] [ RANT ] [ GNDN ] [ STORE ] [ FORUM ] GOTW ] [ VAULT ]

version 3.3 © 2001
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
Benjamin D. Hutchins
E P U (Colour)