[ EPU Foyer ] [ Lab and Grill ] [ Bonus Theater!! ] [ Rhetorical Questions ] [ CSRANTronix ] [ GNDN ] [ Subterranean Vault ] [ Discussion Forum ]

Eyrie Productions, Unlimited

Subject: "Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy    
Conferences The Legacy of Korra Topic #56
Reading Topic #56
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
14031 posts
Jan-05-14, 11:48 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
 
   (was in re Agreement in Principle)

>You have to admit, the Valkyrie would be a pretty awesome
>candidate for the RetroTech treatment.

Certain engineers at New Avalon Aviation agree with you, or will in about 20 in-story years. (Check out the "future plans" part at the end.)

>Possibly too small for Azula's purposes, though. :)

Not much "possibly" about it; there's not even room for hiber-pods in there, let alone real crew accommodations.

Mind you, even in the real world, the Valkyrie's profile (snrk, I just realized what I did there) was subject to a bit of scale uncertainty. A star yacht that shape wouldn't be outside the realm of possibility as a deeply quirky custom order...

... I may go with that. I mean, we haven't seen the Phoenix Queen yet.

Azula wouldn't have ordered such a thing, but she would certainly have been more than willing to "liberate" it from its corrupt and vicious owner (like the Ebon Hawk) or win it in a contest of skill, wits, and/or nerve - the time-honored methods for independent contractors getting their start...

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous [View All] Gryphonadmin Jan-05-14 TOP
  RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Nova Floresca Jan-06-14 1
     RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Mercutio Jan-06-14 2
         RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Offsides Jan-06-14 3
         RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous StClair Jan-06-14 4
     RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Peter Eng Jan-06-14 5
         RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Croaker Jan-06-14 6
             RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous ebony14 Jan-07-14 7
                 RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Peter Eng Jan-07-14 8
  RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Vehrec Jan-08-14 9
  RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Gryphonadmin Feb-09-14 10
     RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Polychrome Feb-10-14 11
     RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous mdg1 Feb-10-14 12
         RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous SpottedKitty Feb-10-14 13
             RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Gryphonadmin Feb-10-14 15
                 RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous McFortner Feb-11-14 24
         RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Gryphonadmin Feb-10-14 14
             RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous MuninsFire Feb-10-14 16
                 RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Gryphonadmin Feb-10-14 17
                     RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous MuninsFire Feb-10-14 20
                         RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous zwol Feb-11-14 25
                         RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Gryphonadmin Feb-11-14 26
                             RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous BobSchroeck Feb-11-14 27
             RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous CdrMike Feb-10-14 18
                 RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Gryphonadmin Feb-10-14 19
                     RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous CdrMike Feb-10-14 22
                         RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Verbena Feb-10-14 23
                         RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous Croaker Feb-12-14 28
                             RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous CdrMike Feb-12-14 29
             RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous mdg1 Feb-10-14 21

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Nova Floresca
Member since Sep-13-13
52 posts
Jan-06-14, 02:58 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Nova%20Floresca Click to send private message to Nova%20Floresca Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON Jan-06-14 AT 03:01 AM (EST) by pjmoyer (moderator)
 
I'm waiting for the day a scoundrel says, "I bought it. Y'know, stock, from the factory." Nobody would ever believe it.

Also, chasing through from that link on the Su-100, I give you the wing accessory for Jet Alone.

"This is probably a stupid question, but . . ."


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Mercutio
Member since May-26-13
527 posts
Jan-06-14, 07:34 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Mercutio Click to send private message to Mercutio Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #1
 
   >I'm waiting for the day a scoundrel says, "I bought it. Y'know, stock,
>from the factory." Nobody would ever believe it.

I'd just like everyone to know I got close to a thousand words into a hypothetical about how ship licensing, registries, and transponder codes might work within Known Space, citing various other sources (including, but not limited to, the Edge of the Empire Star Wars RPG) and existing maritime law, with a long digression into how the presence of the Corporate Sector just fucks everything up, before it did occur to me that, yes, I do occasionally miss the point.

-Merc
Keep Rat


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Offsides
Charter Member
1159 posts
Jan-06-14, 09:47 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Offsides Click to send private message to Offsides Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #2
 
   >before it did occur to me that, yes, I do occasionally miss the point.

Mazal tov! (Slithy tove even, but I digress...)

Offsides

[...] in order to be a realist you must believe in miracles.
-- David Ben Gurion
EPU RCW #π
#include <stdsig.h>


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
StClair
Charter Member
530 posts
Jan-06-14, 11:27 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail StClair Click to send private message to StClair Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #2
 
   *applauds sincerely*


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Peter Eng
Charter Member
990 posts
Jan-06-14, 12:14 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Peter%20Eng Click to send private message to Peter%20Eng Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #1
 
   >I'm waiting for the day a scoundrel says, "I bought it. Y'know, stock,
>from the factory." Nobody would ever believe it.
>

If I ever play a Star Wars scoundrel again, I'm going to have him get his ship in the One Piece At A Time method.

Peter Eng
--
Insert humorous comment here.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Croaker
Charter Member
439 posts
Jan-06-14, 06:36 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Croaker Click to send private message to Croaker Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #5
 
   >>I'm waiting for the day a scoundrel says, "I bought it. Y'know, stock,
>>from the factory." Nobody would ever believe it.
>>
>
>If I ever play a Star Wars scoundrel again, I'm going to have him get
>his ship in the One Piece At A Time method.


I did that once. I was playing an Imperial Officer in a WEG campaign; a former Star Destroyer captain who'd defected to the Rebels. I was in charge of the group's ship, a onetime bulk freighter that I was slowly converting into a battlewagon as we went. (Part of the cargo hold converted to hold some Z-95's, several turbolasers off of wrecked B-wings fitted as gun turrets, &c... I was trying to work out a way to heist a few AT-AT heads to mount on it when the campaign went under...)

--
Croaker
RCW #mc2
"When in doubt, shoot something. Preferably the enemy."


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
ebony14
Member since Jul-11-11
167 posts
Jan-07-14, 09:13 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail ebony14 Click to send private message to ebony14 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #6
 
   >>>I'm waiting for the day a scoundrel says, "I bought it. Y'know, stock,
>>>from the factory." Nobody would ever believe it.
>>>
>>
>>If I ever play a Star Wars scoundrel again, I'm going to have him get
>>his ship in the One Piece At A Time method.
>
>
>I did that once. I was playing an Imperial Officer in a WEG campaign;
>a former Star Destroyer captain who'd defected to the Rebels. I was in
>charge of the group's ship, a onetime bulk freighter that I was slowly
>converting into a battlewagon as we went. (Part of the cargo hold
>converted to hold some Z-95's, several turbolasers off of wrecked
>B-wings fitted as gun turrets, &c... I was trying to work out a way to
>heist a few AT-AT heads to mount on it when the campaign went
>under...)

While that's a completely legitimate method, I can't help but think that Peter was referring to the Johnny Cash song. Carting off a starship by smuggling pieces off the assembly line during your day job. Probably take a little longer than the "Psychobilly Cadillac" of the song, but you'd get just as interesting a vehicle in the process.

Ebony the Black Dragon

"Life is like an anole. Sometimes it's green. Sometimes it's brown. But it's always a small Caribbean lizard."


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Peter Eng
Charter Member
990 posts
Jan-07-14, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Peter%20Eng Click to send private message to Peter%20Eng Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #7
 
   >While that's a completely legitimate method, I can't help but think
>that Peter was referring to the Johnny Cash song.

Circle gets the square!

Peter Eng
--
Insert humorous comment here.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Vehrec
Member since Feb-21-09
83 posts
Jan-08-14, 10:04 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Vehrec Click to send private message to Vehrec Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
9. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #0
 
   >Not much "possibly" about it; there's not even room for hiber-pods in
>there, let alone real crew accommodations.
>
>Mind you, even in the real world, the Valkyrie's profile (snrk, I just
>realized what I did there) was
>subject to a bit of scale uncertainty. A star yacht that shape wouldn't be outside the realm
>of possibility as a deeply quirky custom order...

I actually once saw a line-drawing of a 'modified' B-70 layout as a passenger jet. It was quite austere-one row of seats down each side, and that was it, but I see no reason why you couldn't create a very compact crew cabin with some inventive engineering. After all, if Jebediah Kerman can spend 10 years in a Mark One Capsule...


(Yes, I'm aware that Kerbal Space Program doesn't model the crew needing space to live in, and I'm aware that Grand Tours with Jeb are no longer as rewarding as they once were. Jebediah is a living legend.)

“Navigare Necesse Est”-'Get me out of here!'

Group Captain Konstantin Vehrec


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
14031 posts
Feb-09-14, 11:21 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON Feb-10-14 AT 00:30 AM (EST)
 
>>You have to admit, the Valkyrie would be a pretty awesome
>>candidate for the RetroTech treatment.
>
>A star yacht that shape wouldn't be outside the realm
>of possibility as a deeply quirky custom order...
>
>... I may go with that. I mean, we haven't seen the Phoenix
>Queen
yet.

In the end, I didn't go with that, but there is a certain resemblance in some respects.

Ladies and gentlebeings, the Phoenix Queen:


click for HD resolution

The basic shape of the Phoenix Queen was born when Phil directed my attention to this illustration. The first instruction given to the artist when he accepted the commission was, "Viewed from above, the ship should be the shape of the design on the back of her jacket." From there, well, things developed as they develop. I might do an "evolution of" gallery sometime, like I did with the One-Hit Wonder - I have all the prototype images that went before the one above.

The artist is one Adam Kopala, and was ace to work with (so much so that I spun straight out of this one into a companion project with him). Check out his rockin' dA gallery and keep him in mind if you find yourself in the market for a similar project one day, won't you? UNSOLICITED ENDORSEMENT

Just for funsies, I'll also make the image available in full HD resolution and at its even more colossal original size.

Detailed specifications and an origin story of sorts are in the works, but I cannot make commitments as to timing, since we're getting into the meaty part of the semester now and I can't predict when the other zombies will let me have the brain. My original thought was to hold off on releasing this pic until I had a new story to go with it, but that was just leading to frustration, so here. More to come later.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Polychrome
Charter Member
452 posts
Feb-10-14, 02:03 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Polychrome Click to send private message to Polychrome Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #10
 
   Neat! Also that gallery is pretty cool, Y'all should definitely check it out

Polychrome

Look! A monkey!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
mdg1
Member since Aug-25-04
1001 posts
Feb-10-14, 08:27 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail mdg1 Click to send private message to mdg1 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
12. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #10
 
   Looks like a K'vort-class Bird of Prey built by Kuat Drive Yards and modded by Tony "Throw on some hot-rod red" Stark. :)

Mario


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
SpottedKitty
Member since Jun-15-04
223 posts
Feb-10-14, 10:45 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail SpottedKitty Click to send private message to SpottedKitty Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #12
 
   That sounds nearly as weird as a 3D model I picked up a while ago, of the original starship Enterprise... if it had been designed by Chris Foss instead of Matt Jeffries.

--
Unable to save the day: File is read-only.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
14031 posts
Feb-10-14, 03:13 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
15. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #13
 
   >That sounds nearly as weird as a 3D model I picked up a while ago, of
>the original starship Enterprise...
>if it had been designed by Chris Foss instead of Matt Jeffries.

Chris Foss the illustrator of The Joy of Sex? That Chris Foss?

Gonna be honest: afraid to click that link now.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
McFortner
Charter Member
346 posts
Feb-11-14, 01:52 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail McFortner Click to send private message to McFortner Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via ICQ  
24. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #15
 
   You've probably seen a lot more of Foss' work on the covers of sci-fi novels. He's done a ton of space related works.

http://www.chrisfossart.com/

Michael C. Fortner
"Maxim 37: There is no such thing as "overkill".
There is only "open fire" and "I need to reload".


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
14031 posts
Feb-10-14, 03:10 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
14. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #12
 
   LAST EDITED ON Feb-10-14 AT 03:11 PM (EST)
 
>Looks like a K'vort-class Bird of Prey built by Kuat Drive Yards and
>modded by Tony "Throw on some hot-rod red" Stark. :)

She's actually quite a lot smaller than either of the common bird-of-prey classes, but particularly the K'vort, which is enormous. Ye olde Haynes guide notes that no two birds-of-prey are exactly the same size because they're not built according to any sort of standardized procedure, which might be the most elegant explanation of the effects people screwing up scale shots I've ever encountered. However, it also claims that the smaller B'rel class averages around 140 meters (which is, what, 450 feet or thereabouts), while the K'vort class clocks in at a mighty hefty ~680m (2200-odd feet).

By contrast, I don't have final measurements for the Phoenix Queen yet, but we think she's roughly the same length as a large real-world airliner or strategic airlift jet, ca. 250 feet (B747/A380/An-124 territory). Longer but narrower than a YT-1300-class freighter, with a roughly similar interior volume, but arranged in a more crew-friendly way (since the Queen doesn't have to be configurable to carry cargo) on three decks.

As for the color scheme, that is perfectly legitimate Fire Nation livery. Hell, compared to the way her old man would have blinged that shit up, it's positively low-key. :) I was especially pleased by how tasteful the gold stripes came out. I had experimented with a couple of configurations that looked a lot better in my head than on the screen, and Adam split the difference perfectly.

--G.
"It's a bit showy," Azula mused. "Of course, sir," said the Sink Central Intelligence Unit dryly. "What was I thinking. You're usually so discreet."
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
MuninsFire
Member since Mar-27-07
150 posts
Feb-10-14, 03:25 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail MuninsFire Click to send private message to MuninsFire Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
16. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #14
 
   >Ye olde Haynes guide notes that no two birds-of-prey
>are exactly the same size because they're not built according to any
>sort of standardized procedure, which might be the most elegant
>explanation of the effects people screwing up scale shots I've ever
>encountered.

Because apparently the replicator can handle any parts replacement required by scaling the blueprints up or down as necessary, thus making my instinctive "that's going to kill you on maintenance, guv" response nullified.

O'course, the amusing fallout from that would be the ability to raise funds for buildings/monuments/etc. by providing unique collectibles replicated from the CADs for the original...

--
In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
A stately pleasure-dome
decree,
Where Alph, the sacred river,
ran
Through caverns measureless to
man
Down to a sunless sea


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
14031 posts
Feb-10-14, 03:55 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
17. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #16
 
   >Because apparently the replicator can handle any parts replacement
>required by scaling the blueprints up or down as necessary, thus
>making my instinctive "that's going to kill you on maintenance, guv"
>response nullified.

Well, technically I think it's because the canonical Klingon military-industrial complex is a "total war" command economy based largely on slave labor, and so the heads of the Great Houses - who commission warships individually and without reference to one another - don't particularly give a shit if it does kill somebody on maintenance.

It doesn't work that way in the UF universe, but then, we don't have to worry about the effects people using the 36-inch shooting model of the bird-of-prey in the same shot as the 44-inch model of the Excelsior-class, and suchlike. :)

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
MuninsFire
Member since Mar-27-07
150 posts
Feb-10-14, 05:23 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail MuninsFire Click to send private message to MuninsFire Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
20. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #17
 
   I was thinking more a proverbial 'kill' as in 'too expensive for words' than a literal 'maintenance personnel are expendable munitions' sense - there's a reason why interchangeable parts greatly enhanced the capabilities of armies during the 19th century...

--
In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
A stately pleasure-dome
decree,
Where Alph, the sacred river,
ran
Through caverns measureless to
man
Down to a sunless sea


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
zwol
Member since Feb-24-12
67 posts
Feb-11-14, 03:56 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail zwol Click to send private message to zwol Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
25. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #20
 
   If you'd prefer a less high-tech continuity patch, consider that Boeing -- iiuc one of the last bastions of union manufacturing in America, so about as far from not giving a shit about labor costs as you can get -- is perfectly happy to customize your order of 7n7s within pretty wide limits, including changes to the length of the fuselage or how far back the upper deck (on a double-decker model) goes. The vast majority of the interchangeable parts remain interchangeable if you add a few more monocoque segments aft of the wings, after all.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
14031 posts
Feb-11-14, 04:15 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
26. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #20
 
   LAST EDITED ON Feb-11-14 AT 04:18 PM (EST)
 
>I was thinking more a proverbial 'kill' as in 'too expensive for
>words' than a literal 'maintenance personnel are expendable munitions'
>sense

Yes, I know. And I was playing on it, because we were talking about the Klingon military-industrial complex, and they have different interpretations of these things.*

>there's a reason why interchangeable parts greatly enhanced
>the capabilities of armies during the 19th century...

I think you may be guilty of examining these things too closely, particularly since the explanation of why Klingon stuff is all hilariously nonstandardized is endemic to Star Trek and not the case in the universe for which I am responsible. :)

That said, there's still plenty of room in the UF universe for hand-crafted (or at least hand-designed) one-offs and special editions. In the 23rd century particularly, there was a "craft ship" movement which saw dozens of famous makers of custom one-off starships make names for themselves. Starships being big, unwieldy objects with lots of moving parts, these makers didn't literally build their products personally by hand - they generally operated out of workshops that were massively automated, and devised their creations to make use of off-the-shelf major components wherever practical - but for the most part, their ships were (as the sums of their parts) the products of single intelligences. They were comparable to really-high-end custom carmakers today, or musical or scientific instrument makers of earlier ages.

(For surviving examples of this kind of work in the late-FI/NF bridge era, look to Naboo - the government of that planet possesses several fine examples of the 23rd-century custom shipwright's art, meticulously preserved and maintained in operational condition by the Royal Engineering Corps.)

Sadly, the custom starship scene rather died out in the early 24th century. Some say GENOM and the big Corellian shipyards conspired under the table to stamp it out. Others believe that the creativity and personal ambition required to succeed in the business were made much rarer in young people by the general ossification of galactic society that happened with GENOM in such a cultural catbird seat for so long. Still others think the massive overhead required to be a really independent creator in that field simply got to be too much for anyone to manage alone, particularly after the Federation came along in the 2330s, with its much more elaborate industrial regulation bureaucracy than the United Galactica had.

By the late 24th and early 25th centuries, you still see some pretty high-end small-starship customizers out there, but they all start with some major company's production spaceframes and drive hardware - letting bigger, better-heeled organizations do the heavy lifting in terms of engineering and large-structure production - and very, very few of them work alone.

(It happens that I've been thinking about this very phenomenon a bit lately... )

--G.
* "Banter's not the same if you say it slower, Squiffy!"
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
BobSchroeck
Charter Member
2028 posts
Feb-11-14, 04:48 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail BobSchroeck Click to send private message to BobSchroeck Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
27. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #26
 
   > Still others think the massive overhead required to be a
>really independent creator in that field simply got to be too much for
>anyone to manage alone, particularly after the Federation came along
>in the 2330s, with its much more elaborate industrial regulation
>bureaucracy than the United Galactica had.

...and now I suddenly have an image of a planet-sized custom starship shop which has gone into hibernation awaiting the return of the galactic culture and economy necessary to support their unique services...

-- Bob
-------------------
My race is pacifist and does not believe in war. We kill only out of personal spite.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
CdrMike
Member since Feb-20-05
375 posts
Feb-10-14, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail CdrMike Click to send private message to CdrMike Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
18. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #14
 
   >Ye olde Haynes guide notes that no two birds-of-prey
>are exactly the same size because they're not built according to any
>sort of standardized procedure, which might be the most elegant
>explanation of the effects people screwing up scale shots I've ever
>encountered.

The guide should have a subtitle reading "Or Paramount is f**kin' cheap!" Different bridges? Captain's preference. Different sizes? Scaling up and down the same basic design. Little difference in the types of ships Klingons use? Standardization around simple designs that then are outfitted for a particular mission. It also makes semi-canon a fan theory that has been around since The Enterprise Incident, namely that of a short lived Klingon-Romulan alliance, just to explain how the Romulans got Klingon cruisers while the Klingons had cloaking devices after The Search for Spock.


>By contrast, I don't have final measurements for the Phoenix
>Queen
yet, but we think she's roughly the same length as a large
>real-world airliner or strategic airlift jet, ca. 250 feet
>(B747/A380/An-124 territory). Longer but narrower than a
>YT-1300-class freighter, with a roughly similar interior volume, but
>arranged in a more crew-friendly way (since the Queen doesn't
>have to be configurable to carry cargo) on three decks.

IIRC, that's roughly in the same ballpark as the Normandy SR-1.

>As for the color scheme, that is perfectly legitimate Fire Nation
>livery. Hell, compared to the way her old man would have blinged that
>shit up, it's positively low-key. :) I was especially pleased by how
>tasteful the gold stripes came out. I had experimented with a couple
>of configurations that looked a lot better in my head than on the
>screen, and Adam split the difference perfectly.

Think it strikes a good compromise between showy and understated. Enough to let one know on first glance just whose ship it is, but not so ostentatious that people will assume she's just showing off.

>"It's a bit showy," Azula mused. "Of course, sir,"
>said the Sink Central Intelligence Unit dryly. "What was I thinking.
>You're usually so discreet."

So I wasn't the only one who thought the Sink CIU sounded like a poor-man's JARVIS.

--------------------------
CdrMike, Renegade Time Lord

"I have questions, but number one is this: What in the name of sanity have you got on your head?"
"It's a fez. I wear a fez now. Fezzes are cool."
- River Song and Eleventh Doctor, "The Big Bang," Doctor Who


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
14031 posts
Feb-10-14, 04:33 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
19. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #18
 
   >It also makes
>semi-canon a fan theory that has been around since The Enterprise
>Incident
, namely that of a short lived Klingon-Romulan alliance,

I'm not sure how that's a "fan theory", since they mentioned it in that very episode, but... :)

>Think it strikes a good compromise between showy and understated.
>Enough to let one know on first glance just whose ship it is, but not
>so ostentatious that people will assume she's just showing off.

Well, one has to know one's audience, after all. Even if it were not Azula's personal style to be sort of straightforwardly glamorous (and it is), Phoenix Enterprises does a lot of work for the likes of the Royal Astrographic Society of Salusia, the Federation Celestial Survey Board, and (usually under cover of the former) various intelligence agencies. For the firm's interface with that level of clientele, you don't want to be too showy-offy, but you do want to present a well-maintained, professional appearance - one that indicates you take pride in your equipment and the quality of your work.*

>So I wasn't the only one who thought the Sink CIU sounded like a
>poor-man's JARVIS.

I'm pretty sure that was entirely intentional.

--G.
* As Azula once said to Sokka, primarily in a successful effort to make Katara spit out some tea.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
CdrMike
Member since Feb-20-05
375 posts
Feb-10-14, 06:14 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail CdrMike Click to send private message to CdrMike Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
22. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #19
 
   >I'm not sure how that's a "fan theory", since they mentioned it in
>that very episode, but... :)

I had to check Memory Alpha to refresh my memory, but they indeed never said outright that an alliance had been formed. There was a line about intelligence suggesting Romulans were using Klingon designs, but nothing more was said. Since Klingons subsequently showed up with cloaking devices in the movies and later TV series, the "alliance" was treated as canon.

>Well, one has to know one's audience, after all. Even if it were
>not Azula's personal style to be sort of straightforwardly
>glamorous (and it is), Phoenix Enterprises does a lot of work for the
>likes of the Royal Astrographic Society of Salusia, the Federation
>Celestial Survey Board, and (usually under cover of the former)
>various intelligence agencies. For the firm's interface with that
>level of clientele, you don't want to be too showy-offy, but you do
>want to present a well-maintained, professional appearance - one that
>indicates you take pride in your equipment and the quality of your
>work.*

And gunmetal gray or thermocoat white get boring after awhile. And it makes it easier to con authorities into believing one is a legitimate businesswoman and not a spy when your vessel doesn't look like you just dug it out of the Scrapyard.

>I'm pretty sure that was entirely intentional.

Can't say I had any problem with it. Though Azula probably got tired of being referred to as "sir" all the time after awhile.

>* As Azula once said to Sokka, primarily in a
>successful effort to make Katara spit out some tea.

That does seem like their relationship post-Twilight, a grudging friendship with the occasional spat after Azula needles Katara a little too much in one sitting.

--------------------------
CdrMike, Renegade Time Lord

"I have questions, but number one is this: What in the name of sanity have you got on your head?"
"It's a fez. I wear a fez now. Fezzes are cool."
- River Song and Eleventh Doctor, "The Big Bang," Doctor Who


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Verbena
Charter Member
446 posts
Feb-10-14, 10:41 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Verbena Click to send private message to Verbena Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
23. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #22
 
   >>* As Azula once said to Sokka, primarily in a
>>successful effort to make Katara spit out some tea.

>
>That does seem like their relationship post-Twilight, a grudging
>friendship with the occasional spat after Azula needles Katara a
>little too much in one sitting.

Not even the supremely well-traveled Sokka was expecting anything like Fisto.


--------

this world created by the
hands of the gods
everything is false
everything is a LIE
the final days have come
now
let everything be destroyed

--mu


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Croaker
Charter Member
439 posts
Feb-12-14, 00:58 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Croaker Click to send private message to Croaker Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
28. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #22
 
   >I had to check Memory Alpha to refresh my memory, but they indeed
>never said outright that an alliance had been formed. There was a
>line about intelligence suggesting Romulans were using Klingon
>designs, but nothing more was said. Since Klingons subsequently
>showed up with cloaking devices in the movies and later TV series, the
>"alliance" was treated as canon.

And of course the Doylist explanation is a lot simpler.
-
By the time they shot 'The Enterprise Incident', they'd -lost- the model used for the Romulan ship in 'Balance of Terror', so they just subbed in what they had and didn't really think anyone would care. (Trek producers have a long tradition of expecting continuity to be something that only people with far too much time on their hands should give a damn about.)

Early drafts of ST3, on the other hand, had it being a -Romulan- ship, thus Cloaking Device becoming a key plot point. When they changed the baddies to Klingons they threw in a plot-point about it being a Romulan ship that that individual captain had personally stolen, being the epic pirate that he is, but it got lost on the cutting-room floor and was never seen again.

I kinda like Diane Duane's take on it, where it's a bit of Klingon imperialism taken to Soviet-arms-export-deal-to-Iran heights, the Roms are forced to buy these ships by treaty that they really didn't want to sign but didn't have much choice about, and by gods but they SUCK, 'cause Klingon engineering and maintenance and design aesthetic is oh my god, but it's that or face war with both the Klinks and the Feds at the same time, and that's just so not happening.

(Alternatively, SFB's explanation that the Romulans just never could get warp drive working for tactical combat maneuvering, so it was useless except for getting from system to system, because the Klinks and Feds and Gorns kept sabotaging their research projects... that's taking intelligence failure to ComStar ROM levels of author fiat.)

--
Croaker
RCW #mc2
"When in doubt, shoot something. Preferably the enemy."


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
CdrMike
Member since Feb-20-05
375 posts
Feb-12-14, 03:32 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail CdrMike Click to send private message to CdrMike Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
29. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #28
 
   >By the time they shot 'The Enterprise Incident', they'd -lost- the
>model used for the Romulan ship in 'Balance of Terror', so they just
>subbed in what they had and didn't really think anyone would
>care. (Trek producers have a long tradition of expecting
>continuity to be something that only people with far too much time on
>their hands should give a damn about.
)

Hey, I resemble that remark.

Seriously, when one considers that TOS kept dancing on the edge of cancellation for three years, putting a lot of thought into continuity for what would likely be a short-lived TV series probably wasn't high on the priority list.

>Early drafts of ST3, on the other hand, had it being a -Romulan- ship,
>thus Cloaking Device becoming a key plot point. When they changed the
>baddies to Klingons they threw in a plot-point about it being a
>Romulan ship that that individual captain had personally stolen, being
>the epic pirate that he is, but it got lost on the cutting-room floor
>and was never seen again.

And I think in a lot of ways the franchise was better for it. The BoP has become a quintessential Klingon ship, small but powerful and the cloaking device giving it that edge over larger foes.

>I kinda like Diane Duane's take on it, where it's a bit of Klingon
>imperialism taken to Soviet-arms-export-deal-to-Iran heights, the Roms
>are forced to buy these ships by treaty that they really didn't want
>to sign but didn't have much choice about, and by gods but they SUCK,
>'cause Klingon engineering and maintenance and design aesthetic is oh
>my god, but it's that or face war with both the Klinks and the Feds at
>the same time, and that's just so not happening.

Yeah, the Klingon approach to engineering really does have that Soviet vibe of "It may be slow, it may be heavy, and it may break down, but by Lenin/Kahless it can take one hell of a beating." It's fitting that in the Haynes guide, it explicitly says that engineers are expected to go down with the ship in order to preserve their honor, since the rest of the crew would not need to abandon if the engineers had done their job right.

>(Alternatively, SFB's explanation that the Romulans just never could
>get warp drive working for tactical combat maneuvering, so it was
>useless except for getting from system to system, because the Klinks
>and Feds and Gorns kept sabotaging their research projects... that's
>taking intelligence failure to ComStar ROM levels of author fiat.)

It also goes against pretty much everything we've been told, namely that Romulans are the masters of espionage and skullduggery, so multiple powers getting one over them seems sorta implausible.

--------------------------
CdrMike, Renegade Time Lord

"I have questions, but number one is this: What in the name of sanity have you got on your head?"
"It's a fez. I wear a fez now. Fezzes are cool."
- River Song and Eleventh Doctor, "The Big Bang," Doctor Who


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
mdg1
Member since Aug-25-04
1001 posts
Feb-10-14, 06:08 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail mdg1 Click to send private message to mdg1 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
21. "RE: Aerospacecraft of the Rich and Dangerous"
In response to message #14
 
   >>Looks like a K'vort-class Bird of Prey built by Kuat Drive Yards and
>>modded by Tony "Throw on some hot-rod red" Stark. :)
>
>She's actually quite a lot smaller than either of the common
>bird-of-prey classes, but particularly the K'vort, which is
>enormous.

BoP sizes confuse me. But I'll take your word for it. :)


>"It's a bit showy," Azula mused. "Of course, sir,"
>said the Sink Central Intelligence Unit dryly. "What was I thinking.
>You're usually so discreet."

*shatters*

Mario


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

[ YUM ] [ BIG ] [ ??!? ] [ RANT ] [ GNDN ] [ STORE ] [ FORUM ] [ VAULT ]

version 3.3 © 2001
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
Benjamin D. Hutchins
E P U (Colour)