9. "RE: Correspondence II (non-broken?)"
In response to message #1
Huh... Well, that explains that; though I'd just assumed it was something on my end. I've had posts truncate because of timeouts, I'd assumed this was just more of the same. Interesting note: I did get a complete version eventually, and before the mentioned edit, after going to another post and coming back to this one.
Of COURSE you wernt expecting it! No One expects the FANNISH INQUISITION! RCW# 86