|
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
CdrMike
Member since Feb-20-05
899 posts |
Jan-14-17, 03:38 AM (EDT) |
|
7. "RE: A note"
In response to message #3
|
At the same time, the H-44 design wasn't exactly out of line with what other navies were contemplating. Japan had been working on its own monster, Design A-150 (aka "Super Yamato") before giving it up in 1941 because the demand for other ship types meant there wasn't enough steel to even consider building a single ship. She would have been smaller by comparison the H-44, but she still would have sported 20-inch guns and sported enough armor to shrug off all but the most determined carrier strike force. And over here in the states, we had the Montana class on the drawing boards which was nearly as long if not as broad as the H-44, if only because it was designed under the guidelines of being the biggest ship we could manage while staying within the Panamax restrictions. And she substituted heavier shells for greater throw weight, adding in a fourth turret with a newer 16-inch gun design. But like Japan, we never built them because we were turning out carriers as fast as possible and the Montana (on paper) wouldn't have been able to keep up with a fleet carrier at flank speed. -------------------------- CdrMike, Overwatch Reject "You know, the world could always use more heroes." - Tracer, Overwatch |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page | Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
version 3.3 © 2001
Eyrie Productions,
Unlimited
Benjamin
D. Hutchins
E P U (Colour)
|