[ EPU Foyer ] [ Lab and Grill ] [ Bonus Theater!! ] [ Rhetorical Questions ] [ CSRANTronix ] [ GNDN ] [ Subterranean Vault ] [ Discussion Forum ] [ Gun of the Week ]

Eyrie Productions, Unlimited

Subject: "(Gpedia) HMS Reckless"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy    
Conferences Featured Documents Topic #286
Reading Topic #286
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22420 posts
Jan-13-17, 10:58 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"(Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
 
   LAST EDITED ON Feb-12-20 AT 02:53 AM (EST)
 
[Phil found us a picture! --G.]

NOTE: You should really read the associated Mini-Story first. --G.

Galactipedia
Consider the Source!

Re-class battleship
from Galactipedia, the Galactic Encyclopedia
redirected from HMS Reckless (X204)


The only known photograph of HMS Reckless at sea, taken for the RN archive by Akasaai; declassified 2158

The Re-class superfortress battleships were a class of experimental warships designed by the Royal Navy of Earth's United Kingdom during the 21st-century global crisis known as the Fog War (2038–2059).

In actual fact, the notion of the Re-class as a "class" at all is a misnomer; though four vessels were planned on paper, three of them were never built, nor even truly intended.

Background

The "Re" class was conceived in 2048 as a desperate attempt to break the complete stranglehold of the Fleet of Fog on the territorial waters surrounding the island of Great Britain. Like all of Earth's island nations, the UK suffered terribly under the Fog's interdiction of the seas, since 21st-century Earth's economy had been so thoroughly globalized for so long that such countries could no longer be anything approaching self-sufficient and maintain an acceptable standard of living for their existing populations.

The answer Britain's increasingly frantic naval architects came up with was to pool every last scrap of advanced, experimental, and/or alien technology that could be pulled together into a single vessel, designed and constructed for maximum power and survivability, with the hope that such a ship would be able to clear the Fog presence from the English Channel and enable Britain to re-establish contact with the continent of Europe. In an attempt to prevent the full scale of the project from being revealed by its stupendous cost, it was documented as a development effort intended to produce a class of four superfortress battleships. In reality, only one was ever expected to be built: the prototype "lead" ship, codenamed HMS Reckless.

Design

Reckless was intended to be the most powerful vessel of any kind—including starships—constructed on Earth to date, capable of going toe-to-toe with the fearsome Fog North Atlantic Fleet. Her chief designer, British naval architect Sir Miles A.G. Thurston (a descendant of the prominent early-twentieth-century ship designer Sir George Thurston), envisioned her as a weapon capable of confronting even the North Atlantic Fleet's flagship, a Fog realization of the never-built German super-dreadnought H-40, and her escorts—a force which had all but annihilated the RN's Grand Fleet at Scapa Flow ten years before.

To this end, virtually every offensive or defensive technology available was incorporated into her design, including fragments of captured alien hardware and the products of black projects undertaken by a dozen or more countries during the Contact Wars. These were included regardless of whether human scientists fully understood them, or even understood them at all, so long as they could be gotten to work.

The ship's name, Reckless, reflects this risk-indifferent, glory-or-disaster approach to development. As Thurston later wrote, "Every one involved was aware that the result of our labours might be an uncontrollable Frankenstein monster of the seas, as dangerous to us as to the enemy; but what choice had we? At the time, we could see no alternative."

The centerpiece of this radical, half-comprehended mélange of technologies was the crown jewel of the human naval intelligence community's largely fruitless campaign against the Fog menace: a device captured at hideous expense from one of the enemy's repair stations on the French coast shortly after the war began, and believed to be the intact core of a Fleet of Fog vessel.[what?! citation VERY MUCH NEEDED] As a result of this inclusion and other alien influences, the final form of the vessel as constructed is reputed to have been at some variance with Thurston's original plan. However, frustratingly little documentary evidence exists; since the project was conducted at a level above top secret and covered up after the fact, no photographs or drawings, either of the ship as planned or as built, can now be found.

As such, we have virtually no specifics of Reckless's design or capabilities, beyond the vague references and allusions to be found in Thurston's memoirs, those of a crew member, and the one extant work of contemporary history on the British Fog campaign (Constanza Cigrand's 2160 book Never Shall Be Slaves). According to these sources, the ship was over 1,500 feet long, displacing somewhat in excess of 200,000 tons, and equipped with a mix of armaments ranging from 25-inch conventional naval artillery to phased plasma beam emitters, guided missiles, and a gravity wave weapon reputed to be "capable of destroying a seaport at a stroke" (Thurston, 2101). She was also supposedly equipped with some equivalent to the Fog's energy armor, in addition to an abundance of physical armor made from a mix of advanced alien alloys and composites. There are also reports that she had a flight deck for automated attack drones, but virtually nothing is known about these.

Because she was designed and constructed to be largely self-operating, she had a crew complement of only 20 people, in spite or her gigantic size. These personnel ran the ship from a control center in the superstructure, where the bridge of a conventional vessel would have been. In the event of the ship's loss, they were provided with a submersible lifeboat in which to attempt an escape.

Operational history

This colossal shipbuilding effort, in a time of ever-worsening economic and physical circumstances, took the better part of a decade and virtually finished the job of bankrupting the nation; but on August 14, 2058, under conditions of utmost secrecy, Reckless sailed from Barrow-in-Furness and headed south, bound for the Channel and her planned confrontation with H-40.

Her first contact with the Fog came two days later, when she encountered a Fog patrol off the Cornish coast. These patrols, which generally consisted of a dozen or more replica German Type 1934 and British L- and M-class destroyers, had bottled up what remained of the Royal Navy after the Battle of Scapa Flow with little effort. Reckless engaged them at 14:42 hours British Summer Time on August 16. She reported the enemy force destroyed, with no damage to herself, at 14:57. Spurred by her success in that initial encounter, Reckless proceeded northeast along the French, Belgian, and Dutch coasts, marauding through coastal pickets and demolishing Fog installations at Cherbourg, Le Havre, Boulogne-sur-Mer, Antwerp, and The Hague by offshore bombardment.

This ostentatious operational pattern was intended to attract and hold the full interest of Fog Forces in the area, and it succeeded. Early on the morning of August 20, Reckless met H-40 and its escorts in the North Sea, approximately 150 miles east-southeast of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.

The details of the battle that ensued are fragmentary at best, since the handful of human witnesses were sworn to secrecy under pain of extreme criminal prosecution after the fact. The only one known to have broken this confidence, a junior rating aboard Reckless, left an incomplete account decades later, and cannot be considered an entirely reliable narrator.[citation needed] [well, exactly]

According to that account, Reckless sank a number of H-40's escorts, including replicas of the heavy cruisers Admiral Hipper and HMS Cornwall, before coming to grips with the flagship itself. During the ensuing artillery duel, the Fog vessel scored a direct hit on Reckless's command center, killing about half of the crew and leaving the equipment there inoperable. Unable to control the vessel, the survivors abandoned ship.

The Fog did not engage the Reckless survivors' lifeboat, either because they failed to detect it, or because it was withdrawing toward home (as the Fog often ignored small craft in retreat). Looking back by periscope, the ranking survivor (name not disclosed in the single extant account of the incident, but supposed to have been the ship's second lieutenant) expected to see H-40 and its remaining escorts finishing off the crippled Reckless.

Instead, he reportedly saw the ship resume the battle of her own accord, opening fire on the Fog destroyers sent in by the flagship to administer the coup de grâce. These ships were destroyed almost instantly by Reckless's concentrated fire, after which she turned her attention again toward H-40. Operating without human intervention, the experimental superfortress outmaneuvered and outfought the Fog dreadnought, battering it into a helpless hulk and then sinking it with her (only vaguely described) "gravity weapon". With their flagship destroyed, the remaining Fog ships attempted to flee, only to be chased down and exterminated by Reckless with what the surviving account describes as "evident malice."

When the survivors made port in Newcastle-upon-Tyne that evening, they reported these events to the Admiralty. Initially, it appears they were not believed, but ultimately someone was convinced enough to risk dispatching an aerial reconnaissance drone to ascertain the whereabouts and current status of Reckless. They found the ship, damaged but appearing fully operational, off the Dutch coast, steaming southwest—evidently bound for home.

What happened next is unknown, but HMS Reckless does not appear in the historical record thereafter. The Navy List for 2058 lists her as having been stricken on August 22, with the cause given as "scrapped". Given the vast expenditure of time, treasure, and irreplaceble technology she represented, this seems unlikely in the extreme. Some[who?] have speculated that, because she had operated autonomously and human control over her could no longer be guaranteed, the British government ordered her scuttled, either with some self-destruct provision or by a nuclear strike (the only regular Earth-made weapon ever shown to be reliably effective against Fog defensive technology).

Ships

Only one ship of the "Re" class was ever built, but provision for four was made in the 2048 naval budget, and names for the fictitious other three were reserved. The class's nickname comes from the fact that all the planned names began with the letters R-E.

NamePennantBuilderLaid downLaunchedCompletedFate
RecklessX204H.M. Naval Construction Yard West, Barrow-in-Furness2051Unknown2058Unknown, listed as scrapped, 2058
RepulseX205None---Never constructed
RevancheX206None---Never constructed
ResurgentX207None---Never constructed

Notes

- Thurston, Sir Miles Archibald George, Seas of Strife, 2101
- Seaman, An Anonymous British, Reckless and Bold, 2138
- Cigrand, Constanza, Never Shall Be Slaves: The Royal Navy in the Fog War, 2160


Categories: 21st-century warship classes | The Fog War | possible urban legends


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
(Gpedia) HMS Reckless [View All] Gryphonadmin Jan-13-17 TOP
  RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Star Ranger4 Jan-13-17 1
  RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Berk Jan-13-17 2
     RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Gryphonadmin Jan-14-17 4
         RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Berk Jan-14-17 5
             RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless CdrMike Jan-14-17 6
                 RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Gryphonadmin Jan-14-17 8
                     RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless TheOtherSean Jan-14-17 10
  A note Gryphonadmin Jan-14-17 3
     RE: A note CdrMike Jan-14-17 7
         RE: A note Gryphonadmin Jan-14-17 9
     RE: A note Bad Moon Again Feb-12-20 22
         RE: A note Star Ranger4 Feb-17-20 23
  RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless mdg1 Jan-16-17 11
     RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Gryphonadmin Jan-16-17 12
         RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Berk Jan-16-17 13
             RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Gryphonadmin Jan-16-17 14
                 RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless mdg1 Jan-16-17 15
                     RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Gryphonadmin Jan-16-17 17
                         RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless StClair Jan-16-17 18
                 RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Berk Jan-16-17 16
  RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Peter Eng Apr-09-18 19
  RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless McFortner Feb-12-20 20
     RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless Gryphonadmin Feb-12-20 21

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Star Ranger4
Charter Member
2483 posts
Jan-13-17, 11:31 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Star%20Ranger4 Click to send private message to Star%20Ranger4 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
1. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #0
 
   MUAHAHAHAHA!!! Well played, Sir! Well played indeed.

Of course, we SHALL soon find out what Galactapiddly doesn't know...


As soon as you feel its important enough to be telling.

Of COURSE you wernt
expecting it!
No One expects the
FANNISH INQUISITION!

RCW# 86


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Berk
Charter Member
768 posts
Jan-13-17, 11:47 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Berk Click to send private message to Berk Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON Jan-14-17 AT 01:13 AM (EST)
 
RE-class: You're gonna need a bigger boat.

In a more wordy fashion, the RE-class Battleship as she is in game has caused a lot of speculation among Kancolle fans, because her capabilities don't match anything that actually fought in WWII, and DMM has been pretty good about not fielding paper ships.

This has led some to speculate that she might be a ship that DID float, but was never finished. Possibly the USS Kentucky, the last of the Iowas, who at various points in her construction was considered for retrofitting as an Aviation Battleship (straight outta IJN) and a Guided Missile Battleship.

- Berk Watkins
Student of Quantum Bogodynamics


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22420 posts
Jan-14-17, 01:22 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #2
 
   >In a more wordy fashion, the RE-class Battleship as she is in game has
>caused a lot of speculation among Kancolle fans, because her
>capabilities don't match anything that actually fought in WWII, and
>DMM has been pretty good about not fielding paper ships.

Although they have indulged in a number of paper remodels. For instance, of her class only Mogami was remodeled into an aviation cruiser, but you can make all four of them CAVs in-game. Pretty sure there are other remodels I can't specifically think of right now that were planned, but never executed, in real life.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Berk
Charter Member
768 posts
Jan-14-17, 01:45 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Berk Click to send private message to Berk Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #4
 
   Yeah, this is true. And Bismarck's Drei form getting Tirpitz' torpedoes is another example.

A part of this is poor planning on DMM's part, as it's pretty clear they never expected the game to last this long or get this popular. Otherwise we would've never seen Musashi and Yamato only SIX MONTHS after launch. Even without Kai 2 remodels, they're bonkers.

- Berk Watkins
Student of Quantum Bogodynamics


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
CdrMike
Member since Feb-20-05
899 posts
Jan-14-17, 02:56 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail CdrMike Click to send private message to CdrMike Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #5
 
   >Yeah, this is true. And Bismarck's Drei form getting Tirpitz'
>torpedoes is another example.
>
>A part of this is poor planning on DMM's part, as it's pretty clear
>they never expected the game to last this long or get this popular.
>Otherwise we would've never seen Musashi and Yamato only SIX MONTHS
>after launch. Even without Kai 2 remodels, they're bonkers.

Like any such games, there's always the difficulty in keeping balance such that players don't feel as though the game has lost its challenge, but not so difficult that players give up in frustration. Yamato and Musashi are Infinity +1 swords, but they're also so resource hungry in a game where resources are a precious commodity that a lot of admirals won't deploy them outside of events or desperate gambles.

--------------------------
CdrMike, Overwatch Reject

"You know, the world could always use more heroes." - Tracer, Overwatch


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22420 posts
Jan-14-17, 01:09 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #6
 
   >Yamato and Musashi are Infinity +1 swords, but they're also so
>resource hungry in a game where resources are a precious commodity
>that a lot of admirals won't deploy them outside of events or
>desperate gambles.

Well, at least that's somewhat realistic. The wartime IJN was chronically short of both pots to piss in and windows to throw it out of, and the leadership spent most of the war hoarding their big guns for the boss battle, never realizing that they were playing a sandbox game.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
TheOtherSean
Member since Jul-7-08
246 posts
Jan-14-17, 09:52 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail TheOtherSean Click to send private message to TheOtherSean Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #8
 
   >Well, at least that's somewhat realistic. The wartime IJN was
>chronically short of both pots to piss in and windows to throw it out
>of, and the leadership spent most of the war hoarding their big guns
>for the boss battle, never realizing that they were playing a sandbox
>game.
>

The one time the IJN battle line was committed and really could have made a tactical difference, off Samar during the Battle of Leyte Gulf, they turned back.

--
The Other Sean - Don't accept substitutes!
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22420 posts
Jan-14-17, 01:17 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "A note"
In response to message #0
 
   Because this isn't really Wikipedia and you therefore can't click the link:

H-40 was a real concept, though never realized; the 1930s Kriegsmarine had a plan on the books for a battleship class armed with 16-inch guns, the "H-39" type, and two of them had been ordered and laid down when World War II began. These were designated H-39 and H-40 for shipyard purposes, but would have received proper names if they had been completed. As it was, they were scrapped on the ways to reclaim the steel for higher-priority uses.

Later in the war, there were the usual steadily escalating, hilariously inflated, utterly unrealizable plans for battleships H-41 through H-44, the last of which would have been an 1,100-foot, 130,000-ton mobile landmass armed with eight 20-inch guns. (By comparison: Yamato, the largest and most powerful battleship ever actually built, was 836 feet long, displaced 71,000 tons, and had nine 18.1" guns. The H-44 proposal would have been roughly as long as, and a World War I battleship heavier than, a modern Gerald R. Ford-class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.)

Of course, by that point, the Germans couldn't come up with enough steel to build a good-sized garden shed, and nobody ever even attempted to actually build any of the H-ships, but still. The typical "Hitler at the height of his speed freak phase" sort of concept. Even the Fog didn't try to copy that, but they did somehow learn of the H-39 and H-40. Possibly the deciding factor there was that they had started being constructed. No one knows how the Fog acquired their information about 20th-century ships or decided which ones to imitate.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
CdrMike
Member since Feb-20-05
899 posts
Jan-14-17, 03:38 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail CdrMike Click to send private message to CdrMike Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: A note"
In response to message #3
 
   At the same time, the H-44 design wasn't exactly out of line with what other navies were contemplating. Japan had been working on its own monster, Design A-150 (aka "Super Yamato") before giving it up in 1941 because the demand for other ship types meant there wasn't enough steel to even consider building a single ship. She would have been smaller by comparison the H-44, but she still would have sported 20-inch guns and sported enough armor to shrug off all but the most determined carrier strike force.

And over here in the states, we had the Montana class on the drawing boards which was nearly as long if not as broad as the H-44, if only because it was designed under the guidelines of being the biggest ship we could manage while staying within the Panamax restrictions. And she substituted heavier shells for greater throw weight, adding in a fourth turret with a newer 16-inch gun design. But like Japan, we never built them because we were turning out carriers as fast as possible and the Montana (on paper) wouldn't have been able to keep up with a fleet carrier at flank speed.

--------------------------
CdrMike, Overwatch Reject

"You know, the world could always use more heroes." - Tracer, Overwatch


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22420 posts
Jan-14-17, 01:19 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: A note"
In response to message #7
 
   >At the same time, the H-44 design wasn't exactly out of line with what
>other navies were contemplating.

I think the principal difference is that, resource priorities aside, the USN wouldn't have ended up building the Montanas anyway, because by then they'd recognized that battleships were over.* Given enough time to reflect, it's conceivable that the IJN's leadership would have reached the same conclusion, although it would have been very difficult for them to accept. They'd already taken a step or two in that direction by finishing Shinano as a carrier, though.

The Germans, on the other hand, still would've built H-44 if they could have, regardless—and then whined to the devs about Airplanes OP Pls Nerf when the 8th Air Force bombed it like Berlin. (Sure, they'd have had to drop enough bombs to level Silesia in order for enough to hit the ship to do it in, but you know, by '44-'45, the 8th was up for that.)

--G.
* To paraphrase Dinah Washington, battleships were great, now they're outta date, and CVs are the thing this year.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Bad Moon Again
Member since Nov-30-19
16 posts
Feb-12-20, 08:29 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Bad%20Moon%20Again Click to send private message to Bad%20Moon%20Again Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
22. "RE: A note"
In response to message #3
 
   >Because this isn't really Wikipedia and you therefore can't click the
>link:
>
>H-40 was a real concept, though never realized; the 1930s
>Kriegsmarine had a plan on the books for a battleship class armed with
>16-inch guns, the "H-39" type, and two of them had been ordered and
>laid down when World War II began. These were designated H-39
>and H-40 for shipyard purposes, but would have received proper
>names if they had been completed. As it was, they were scrapped on
>the ways to reclaim the steel for higher-priority uses.

>>Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.

If the Fleet of Fog is taking design concepts then oof there's probably some 18inch gunned pseudo-Iowa class ships prowling the Pacific and Atlantic since there was some ideas of sticking those on fast battleships before the Navy decided meh 16 inch is good enough and then the war hit and oh yeah these carrier things are hot shit.

Since Fleet of Fogs don't use carriers that much than yeah oof.

-Bad Moon


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Star Ranger4
Charter Member
2483 posts
Feb-17-20, 05:46 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Star%20Ranger4 Click to send private message to Star%20Ranger4 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
23. "RE: A note"
In response to message #22
 
   >If the Fleet of Fog is taking design concepts then oof there's
>probably some 18inch gunned pseudo-Iowa class ships prowling the
>Pacific and Atlantic since there was some ideas of sticking those on
>fast battleships before the Navy decided meh 16 inch is good enough
>and then the war hit and oh yeah these carrier things are hot shit.
>

Even if you stay with just the series and the OAV's... um, yes. You would be right. Once you add the seriously cool concepts Gryph had... even more so Bad Moon.

Of COURSE you wernt
expecting it!
No One expects the
FANNISH INQUISITION!

RCW# 86


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
mdg1
Member since Aug-25-04
1328 posts
Jan-16-17, 11:02 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail mdg1 Click to send private message to mdg1 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #0
 
   I can't help but wonder if Revanche had been built, would it have eventually been traded with a Japanese vessel commanded by Captain E. Braddock.

Mario


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22420 posts
Jan-16-17, 11:28 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
12. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #11
 
   >I can't help but wonder if Revanche had been built, would it have
>eventually been traded with a Japanese vessel commanded by Captain E.
>Braddock.

Well, it's French for Revenge; other than that, I got nothin'.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Berk
Charter Member
768 posts
Jan-16-17, 02:57 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Berk Click to send private message to Berk Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #12
 
   X-Men joke. The Japanese woman that Psylocke wound up with the body of popped back up in Psylocke's original body, calling herself Revanche at one point.

It was very.. 90s.

- Berk Watkins
Student of Quantum Bogodynamics


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22420 posts
Jan-16-17, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
14. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #13
 
   >X-Men joke. The Japanese woman that Psylocke wound up with the body of
>popped back up in Psylocke's original body, calling herself Revanche
>at one point.

Oh, is that why they suddenly started drawing Psylocke as though she were Asian? I always kind of wondered, but not enough to actually investigate, because, like you say, X-Men in the '90s. It was all very much you-had-to-be-there and I wasn't, so I assumed I wouldn't understand it even if I did look it up. :)

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
mdg1
Member since Aug-25-04
1328 posts
Jan-16-17, 06:56 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail mdg1 Click to send private message to mdg1 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
15. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #14
 
  
>Oh, is that why they suddenly started drawing Psylocke as
>though she were Asian? I always kind of wondered, but not enough to
>actually investigate, because, like you say, X-Men in the '90s.
> It was all very much you-had-to-be-there and I wasn't, so I assumed I
>wouldn't understand it even if I did look it up. :)

My bad. I thought you knew, since you had her working for Sir Victor.

Mario


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22420 posts
Jan-16-17, 07:26 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
17. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #15
 
   >>Oh, is that why they suddenly started drawing Psylocke as
>>though she were Asian? I always kind of wondered, but not enough to
>>actually investigate, because, like you say, X-Men in the '90s.
>> It was all very much you-had-to-be-there and I wasn't, so I assumed I
>>wouldn't understand it even if I did look it up. :)
>
>My bad. I thought you knew, since you had her working for Sir Victor.

Well, I knew her character design had changed. The wherefores of it always kind of eluded me. :)

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
StClair
Charter Member
833 posts
Jan-16-17, 07:45 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail StClair Click to send private message to StClair Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
18. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #17
 
   LAST EDITED ON Jan-16-17 AT 07:46 PM (EST)
 
The real reason was always "because Jim Lee wanted to draw a Hawt Asian Chick" (not a British Rose). Everything else is just excuses.
*spit*

(I liked Davis' classic Betsy, thankyouverymuch.)


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Berk
Charter Member
768 posts
Jan-16-17, 07:16 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Berk Click to send private message to Berk Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
16. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #14
 
   The entire story arc was basically: X-Men In The 90s.

That's really all you have to say to a comics fan and it suddenly makes perfect sense. By which meaning, it makes no goddamn sense at all.

- Berk Watkins
Student of Quantum Bogodynamics


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Peter Eng
Charter Member
2051 posts
Apr-09-18, 03:36 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail Peter%20Eng Click to send private message to Peter%20Eng Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
19. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #0
 
   That image is a nearly perfect mix of "scary" and "how does that even work?"

Peter Eng
--
Insert humorous comment here.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
McFortner
Charter Member
562 posts
Feb-12-20, 02:40 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail McFortner Click to send private message to McFortner Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
20. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #0
 
   I was browsing the Featured Documents tonight and while reading this entry, caught something I never noticed before:

>The Re-class superfortress battleships were a class of
>experimental warships designed by the Royal Navy of Earth's United
>Kingdom during the 21st-century global crisis known as the Fog War
>(2038–2359).

...

> - Thurston, Sir Miles Archibald George, Seas of Strife, 2101
> - Seaman, An Anonymous British, Reckless and Bold, 2138
> - Cigrand, Constanza, Never Shall Be Slaves: The Royal Navy in the Fog War, 2160

I'm guessing the year given for the war's end of 2359 is a typo and probably should be 2059 based on the dates of sources listed at the end of the Galactipedia article.

Michael

Michael C. Fortner
"Maxim 37: There is no such thing as "overkill".
There is only "open fire" and "I need to reload".


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Gryphonadmin
Charter Member
22420 posts
Feb-12-20, 02:55 AM (EDT)
Click to EMail Gryphon Click to send private message to Gryphon Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
21. "RE: (Gpedia) HMS Reckless"
In response to message #20
 
   >I'm guessing the year given for the war's end of 2359 is a typo

Yes, yes it was.

--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
zgryphon at that email service Google has
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

[ YUM ] [ BIG ] [ ??!? ] [ RANT ] [ GNDN ] [ STORE ] [ FORUM ] GOTW ] [ VAULT ]

version 3.3 © 2001
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
Benjamin D. Hutchins
E P U (Colour)