>You know, I'd never really thought about it that way. You are of
>course right; and in fact I'm having trouble thinking of bands that
>hit only the first three. The Beatles, I guess? If only because it is
>hard to find someone who will admit to hating The Beatles even if they
>doEr, uh, hi *raises hand*. Although technically I suppose I more hate the boomers who proselytize the Beatles. Okay, fair enough, they changed your world. They'll never be more than "eh, it's better than commercials" music to me, because they were all dead (or oxidized until moot) by the time I was old enough to listen to music and care.
Also, secondary question: is Nickelback really any worse than, say, Motley Crue? Not attempting to defend them, by any means, just wondering what singled out this one group to be made into failures of myth and legend?
"This is probably a stupid question, but . . ."