[ EPU Foyer ] [ Lab and Grill ] [ Bonus Theater!! ] [ Rhetorical Questions ] [ CSRANTronix ] [ GNDN ] [ Subterranean Vault ] [ Discussion Forum ] [ Gun of the Week ]

Eyrie Productions, Unlimited

Subject: "GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy    
Conferences Gun of the Week Topic #73
Reading Topic #73, reply 12
JFerio
Charter Member
194 posts
May-29-17, 06:58 PM (EDT)
Click to EMail JFerio Click to send private message to JFerio Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
12. "RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV"
In response to message #9
 
   >>Having the pistol
>>grip boost the endurance/output of the Cricket (that was the nickname
>>for the TNG Type 1) looks cool, doesn't necessarily play out as
>>logical because it, at least, adds another potential point of failure.
>
>Ha, I'd forgotten that TNG had the keyring-flashlight model as
>well as the dustbuster. Least visually satisfying prop ever.

And they stopped using it for precisely that reason. It could tend to look like the phaser blast was coming from the actor's fingers unless they made it a point to refer to/show the phaser being drawn.

>Also, semi-relatedly, I've just remembered that (at least on the
>original TV series) the pistol grip does make the phaser more
>powerful as well as longer-lasting. It's a plot point in the episode
>with the Horta ("The Devil in the Dark").
>
>>Most of the Trek universe is like that. Like wandering around in shirt
>>sleeves right next to the antimatter reactor; no real-life
>>organization is going to let any crewmember near that thing without
>>serious anti-hazard measures taken, on account of the slight chance
>>its going to "spring a leak"
>
>To be fair, the engineering crewmen do wear radsuits in the movies.
>In the TNG era, the fact that emergency forcefields were pretty much
>instantaneous and ubiquitous was used as the justification to save
>all that money
omit specialized engineering PPE. Which is an idea
>that got kicked around for the original series—in the episode
>where spacesuits first appeared, the script called for some kind of
>handwave about personal forcefields instead, but the producers decided
>it would require too extreme a suspension of disbelief. Which may
>have been the only time anyone involved in the production of Star
>Trek
ever said that. :)

I actually do miss the radsuits from the movies; they made a lot of sense. They'd have still made sense even in the TNG force field omnipresence. Kind of like I wouldn't want to be standing in an open shuttlebay in anything less than a full-on spacesuit, even as reliable as Trek Tech is. :)

Back to the Type 1 phaser. In the original series, it didn't have a pushbutton trigger. It actually was fired by pressing a dial from one end to the other. The Christmas ornament they put out a number of years ago of the TOS Type 1 actually replicated the raising panel and that it wouldn't "fire" until you reached the end of the dial travel. It made a LOT of sense from a "you want to be sure you're going to fire" and "not firing when it's bumped or dropped" standpoint.

Here's a pic of the "firing position". https://www.yourprops.com/movieprops/original/yp_510ed8d5375214.75401370/Star-Trek-The-Original-Series-Type-1-Phaser-1.jpg?x

>
>--G.
>-><-
>Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod
>Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
>zgryphon at that email service Google has
>Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.





Jeffrey 'JFerio' Crouch
'It'll be all right... I think.' - Nene Romanova



  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV [View All] Gryphonadmin May-28-17 TOP
   RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV CdrMike May-29-17 1
   RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV Mercutio May-29-17 2
      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV drakensis May-29-17 3
      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV McFortner May-29-17 10
          RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV Gryphonadmin May-29-17 15
      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV StClair May-30-17 20
      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV Matrix Dragon Jun-01-17 29
          RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV mdg1 Jun-01-17 30
   RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV NHO May-29-17 4
   RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV JFerio May-29-17 5
      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV mdg1 May-29-17 6
      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV Gryphonadmin May-29-17 7
          RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV JFerio May-29-17 8
              RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV Gryphonadmin May-29-17 9
                 RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV JFerio May-29-17 12
                  RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV Mercutio May-31-17 25
              RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV eriktown May-29-17 11
                  RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV Nathan May-29-17 13
                      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV eriktown May-29-17 14
                      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV Gryphonadmin May-29-17 16
                          RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV ebony14 May-30-17 17
                              RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV Peter Eng May-30-17 21
              RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV MuninsFire May-30-17 18
                  RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV mdg1 May-30-17 19
                      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV MuninsFire May-31-17 22
                          RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV mdg1 May-31-17 24
                              RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV MuninsFire May-31-17 27
                  RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV SpottedKitty May-31-17 23
                      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV MuninsFire May-31-17 26
                      RE: GotW 46: Phaser Mk IV McFortner May-31-17 28


Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

[ YUM ] [ BIG ] [ ??!? ] [ RANT ] [ GNDN ] [ STORE ] [ FORUM ] GOTW ] [ VAULT ]

version 3.3 © 2001
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
Benjamin D. Hutchins
E P U (Colour)