>Heh, yeah. I'll have to check it out and see what options are
>available for MP3 encoding in that program. For example, if it has
>the ability to encode at an average bitrate, rather than a constant
>one, you can squeeze more quality into a smaller file. It does, but I've known files encoded that way to cause problems on playback in the past and wanted to avoid the possibility of one of mine giving people the hassle, so I don't use it. The gains don't really seem to be worth the potential tsuris.
>There's a ring modulator plugin for the
>popular freeware audio program Audacity
... speaking of abstruse weirdness. I remember trying to use that once and wondering whether the person who designed its control interface was being deliberately obtuse in an effort to weed out the insufficiently 1337. Which was me. :)
--G.
-><-
Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Admin
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.