#0, HTTPS links (was re: WH40K nerdery)
Posted by zwol on Jun-06-22 at 12:29 PM
Kendra Kirai wrote:> Edit 3 edit harder: Also, your link is broken, with https://http/ being in front Peeling this off from the WH40K nerdery -- As far as I can tell, it is impossible to mark up a link to an https:// URL on this forum, because the [link:URL|Text] mechanism takes the URL without the scheme and slaps http:// in front of it, no matter what. You can paste an entire https link verbatim, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random , but you can't have link text unless the site does HTTP-to-HTTPS redirection for you. This is becoming increasingly awkward what with the whole web moving to encrypted, but given how old the board software is, I imagine it's not likely to change soon, so, I guess just take this as a PSA?
#1, RE: HTTPS links (was re: WH40K nerdery)
Posted by Gryphon on Jun-06-22 at 12:59 PM
In response to message #0
>This is becoming increasingly awkward what with the whole web moving >to encrypted, but given how old the board software is, I imagine it's >not likely to change soon, so, I guess just take this as a PSA? Do not websites redirect incoming http:// requests to HTTPS if they won't serve them clear? It seems like that should have been an automatic requirement for the changeover, but what do I know, I got out of that business decades ago. Regardless, yeah, I suspect that's not fixable. --G. -><- Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/ zgryphon at that email service Google has Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
#2, RE: HTTPS links (was re: WH40K nerdery)
Posted by Moonsword on Jun-06-22 at 09:03 PM
In response to message #1
>Do not websites redirect incoming http:// requests to HTTPS if they >won't serve them clear? It seems like that should have been an >automatic requirement for the changeover, but what do I know, I got >out of that business decades ago. > >Regardless, yeah, I suspect that's not fixable. > >--G.Most sites do but it's not built into the protocol itself as far as I'm aware. Probably some of the site hosts and such have gotten smarter over time on the public-facing Internet. At the office, there are sites internally we just don't serve over HTTP and the network appliance won't connect you to if you don't come in with the right protocol. The public facing side is programmed to be more user-friendly.
#5, RE: HTTPS links (was re: WH40K nerdery)
Posted by zwol on Jun-07-22 at 11:59 AM
In response to message #2
>>(G) Do not websites redirect incoming http:// requests to HTTPS if they >>won't serve them clear? > > (M) Most sites do but it's not built into the protocol itself as >far as I'm aware.This is also my understanding. The scenario that worries me most, with regard to the limitations of DCForum, is not "http://foo.example/ and https://foo.example/ are two different sites" (because everyone with half an ounce of sense can see that that's a silly thing to do) but rather "https://foo.example/ exists, http://foo.example/ doesn't." Or, at the level of server configuration, foo.example is listening on port 443 but not port 80. I'm imagining this being more and more likely as time goes by and use of cleartext protocols becomes more and more discouraged. At some point, it's going to seem like unnecessary additional attack surface to have that port 80 listener, even if all it ever does is issue redirects to the https version of the site. >> (G) Regardless, yeah, I suspect that's not fixable. Perhaps enough has been said on the subject, then.
#3, RE: HTTPS links (was re: WH40K nerdery)
Posted by Senji on Jun-07-22 at 05:13 AM
In response to message #1
>Do not websites redirect incoming http:// requests to HTTPS if they >won't serve them clear? It seems like that should have been an >automatic requirement for the changeover, but what do I know, I got >out of that business decades ago. > HTTPS is so old that people still thought it was a sensible use of scarce resources to treat https://example.com/ as an entirely different namespace to http://example.com/ ; and the idea that everything should be served over https didn't come around until a lot more recently at which point it was too late to insist it was just http only with extra encryption on top. Basically "we fucked up again", story of the internet it seems :-D L.
#4, RE: HTTPS links (was re: WH40K nerdery)
Posted by Kendra Kirai on Jun-07-22 at 06:21 AM
In response to message #0
Looks like I may have have also flipped the protocols around in my haste and tiredness, so, sorry about that. :3 I didn't actually pay close attention, I just saw that the forum converted the *entire* URL to link by adding another layer and guessed which order was correct.
|