>That was more or less the way it seemed to me when I put together the
>ancient WDF tech readout, but more recently it's occurred to me that I
>kind of had it backward. It strikes me that long-range, long-term
>activities like patrolling are more strategic than tactical, and
>conversely, the big ships with instantaneous spacefold drive, with
>their capacity for nearly instant response, are more inherently
>tactical. In practice, I doubt the distinction even works
>operationally, which is why more recent works (such as the last scene
>in Second Chances Are Illogical) refer to color-coded
>squadrons. Wow, thanks for the quick and detailed response. :) Yeah, I can see your reasoning, and how if the TacFleet/StratFleet distinction was retained,it would probably deal more with operational deployments and demands than specific ship types. Are the color-coded squadrons composed of multiple ship types, like the CFMF carrier task forces? (And do you know where I could find a copy of this tech readout? It sounds like fascinating reading, even if it's no longer canon.)
>There is a separate and official Zeta Cygni Defense Force, but it's
>much smaller and geared mainly toward domestic tasks like patrolling
>the Sphere, customs enforcement, and whatnot. The WDF is under
>contract to do the heavy lifting, as it were.
That would make sense; there's lots of precedent, both in UF and throughout military SF, for local star-system defense fleets. And it also tracks for the WDF being available to reinforce the ZCDF if needed.
Thanks again.
"Everyone gets lost in the darkness
Dreamers learn to steer by the stars..."
- Rush, "The Pass"