|
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
Pasha
Charter Member
1018 posts |
Apr-12-18, 01:56 PM (EDT) |
|
9. "RE: speaking of new member cuso4"
In response to message #8
|
>IMO, it is okay to call something that is aesthetically appealing for >its own sake art. You're trying to make a pretty thing. It's art. It >doesn't have to have meaning to be art. It just has to evoke a >response in the viewer, which this does. (Even if the response is "oh, >that's neat/pretty/a terrible waste of chemical supplies/a shameful >commentary on what passes for modern art in Britain"). > >I wouldn't mind seeing Banksy tag one, though. IMO, the best description of Art isn't the work itself, but the frame by which we discuss the work. A painting isn't Art, Art happens when you look at a painting and think about it. So by that definition, yes there is art in the blue room, as evidenced by this thread. -- -Pasha "Don't change the subject" "Too slow, already did." |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page | Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
version 3.3 © 2001
Eyrie Productions,
Unlimited
Benjamin
D. Hutchins
E P U (Colour)
|