Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
Apr-12-18, 01:56 PM (EDT)|
9. "RE: speaking of new member cuso4"|
In response to message #8
>IMO, it is okay to call something that is aesthetically appealing for |
>its own sake art. You're trying to make a pretty thing. It's art. It
>doesn't have to have meaning to be art. It just has to evoke a
>response in the viewer, which this does. (Even if the response is "oh,
>that's neat/pretty/a terrible waste of chemical supplies/a shameful
>commentary on what passes for modern art in Britain").
>I wouldn't mind seeing Banksy tag one, though.
IMO, the best description of Art isn't the work itself, but the frame by which we discuss the work. A painting isn't Art, Art happens when you look at a painting and think about it.
So by that definition, yes there is art in the blue room, as evidenced by this thread.
"Don't change the subject"
"Too slow, already did."
Alert | IP ||
Printer-friendly page | Edit |
Reply With Quote | Top |
version 3.3 © 2001
E P U (Colour)