|
|
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
Gryphon
Charter Member
23946 posts |
Oct-09-26, 10:43 PM (EDT) |
 |
"The ATF Is Up to Weird Stuff"
| |
Today, in keeping with the federal government's standing policy of announcing things that they know are going to be controversial at 4:45 PM on a Friday, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives announced a new policy on the enforcement of parts of the National Firearms Act of 1934. Basically, what it says is that short-barrelled rifles, short-barrelled shotguns, suppressors, and the various oddities that get filed under "any other weapon" are no longer subject to the registration and taxation requirements of the NFA. This means those items can now be transferred from a regular 01 FFL dealer on Form 4473, like a regular firearm purchase, assuming they're legal in the state where the transaction is happening. Note that this only applies to SBRs, SBSes, AOWs, and suppressors. Machine guns and destructive devices (e.g., explosives and launchers thereof) are still subject to Form 4 registration and the long-standing $200 NFA tax. This is interesting and kind of exciting, but it has a huge caveat built into it that certain enthusiasts may overlook. These items are not being removed from the NFA by this policy change. That would require an act of Congress repealing part or all of the law, and that hasn't happened. All that's happening here is that the ATF is choosing not to enforce the law and notifying everybody of that fact. This is... kind of weird, and means that some future ATF directive could reverse the situation at any moment. Moreover, if and when that happens, NFA items transferred on Form 4473 during the period when it was allowed may not be grandfathered--and the ATF is going to know about them, because Form 4473. What happens then? Well, it depends on how the future feds decide to do re-enforcement. They could require everyone who has an NFA item bought during the hiatus to register and pay the tax retroactively... or they could just seize and destroy all of said items, since they've technically been contraband the whole time. So... could be good! Could be REALLY NOT, but the REALLY NOT potential is Future Everyone's problem. The prospect of future complications is... probably not going to stop me from dabbling in the affected items. Also, and I know I don't usually like to get into politics here, but it's there and it has to be acknowledged: there is the unnerving background fact that this loosening of enforcement is part of the general right-wing erosion of the government, which is... not great in a lot of other ways. I feel a little dirty benefitting from their bullshit... but that's long been part of the inherent paradox of being a Relatively Liberal Gun Guy. --G. -><- Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/ zgryphon at that email service Google has Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam. |
|
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page | Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
 |
Gryphon
Charter Member
23946 posts |
Oct-10-26, 01:58 PM (EDT) |
 |
2. "RE: The ATF Is Up to Weird Stuff"
In response to message #1
| |
LAST EDITED ON Oct-10-26 AT 02:01 PM (EDT) >First thought that comes to mind? This is a desperate attempt to >motivate Trump voters to the polls by throwing them some (more) red >meat ahead of the midterms. It's been in the works for a while now (the tax part of SBS/SBR enforcement was pulled a while back), but you may well be right. It's certainly not a move calculated to convince anyone to switch aisles, that's for sure--even though there are logical arguments to be made that the suppressor provision of the NFA, in particular, has always been silly and should be done away with. (The SBS/SBR part less so, but regulating them has never been as obvious as regulating machine guns and explosives...) The part of me that doesn't agree is convinced that they're working angles to not have the election in the first place, but this isn't really the place to get into that. :/ --G. -><- Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Mod Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/ zgryphon at that email service Google has Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam. |
|
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page | Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|
 |
CdrMike
Member since Feb-20-05
1440 posts |
Oct-10-26, 03:36 PM (EDT) |
 |
3. "RE: The ATF Is Up to Weird Stuff"
In response to message #2
| |
>It's been in the works for a while now (the tax part of SBS/SBR >enforcement was pulled a while back), but you may well be right. It's >certainly not a move calculated to convince anyone to switch aisles, >that's for sure--even though there are logical arguments to be made >that the suppressor provision of the NFA, in particular, has always >been silly and should be done away with. (The SBS/SBR part less so, >but regulating them has never been as obvious as regulating machine >guns and explosives...) I'm in agreement on the suppressors part, I meant to make mention of that in a previous thread but time* got away from me. There's an argument to be made regarding SRS/SBR, but I think it's pretty safe to say that most of those who would get up to nefarious shit with a suppressor probably weren't too worried about complying with the NFA to begin with. >The part of me that doesn't agree is convinced that they're working >angles to not have the election in the first place, but this isn't >really the place to get into that. :/ Yeah, I'm right there with you, but I won't get into it here. *Kronii, you can quit praying for my downfall, you won.
-------------------------- CdrMike, Overwatch Reject "You know, the world could always use more heroes." - Tracer, Overwatch |
|
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page | Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|
 |
|
version 3.3 © 2001
Eyrie Productions,
Unlimited
Benjamin
D. Hutchins
E P U (Colour)
|