|
Eyrie Productions, Unlimited
McFortner
Charter Member
564 posts |
May-10-09, 11:05 PM (EDT) |
|
"Surprise-Class"
|
LAST EDITED ON May-11-09 AT 00:49 AM (EDT) OK, Gryph, I think I have a rough model of the Surprise-Class. From your description I got the idea it would be like a 24th Century version of FASA's Loknar-Class. So here she is:The full size can be found here: http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2489172680099072508KZbrCg Just click on the image and tell it full screen. Sorry the drawing is rough, but the only line drawing of the Sovereign-Class I could find was rough. Now for some of the real artists here to make a better looking drawing.... Michael (edited for my poor spelling....)
| |
Michael C. Fortner RCW #2n 1 "I smoke in moderation. Only one cigar at a time." -- Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Gryphon
Charter Member
22428 posts |
May-10-09, 11:48 PM (EDT) |
|
1. "RE: Surprise-Class"
In response to message #0
|
I had pictured it as a closer analog to the old Reliant, with the warp engines below the saucer, but that is otherwise very close! I'd be interested in seeing it the other way round, if it wouldn't be too much of a hassle; maybe when they're next to each other, it'll turn out that the engines-on-top version looks better. (Two Rs, though. Not a big deal, unless someone goes to do hull graphics, but still. :) --G. -><- Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Admin Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/ Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam. |
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|
McFortner
Charter Member
564 posts |
May-10-09, 11:58 PM (EDT) |
|
2. "RE: Surprise-Class"
In response to message #1
|
Heh, sorry bout that. I can't spell worth a flip and I must have not paid attention to my spell checker.... :) Give me a few and I'll work on the other version. Michael
| |
Michael C. Fortner RCW #2n+1 "I smoke in moderation. Only one cigar at a time." -- Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gryphon
Charter Member
22428 posts |
May-11-09, 12:44 PM (EDT) |
|
9. "RE: Surprise-Class"
In response to message #6
|
>I dunno but it seems like the warp nacelles are canted a little too >far down compared to the high-nacelle version? Mm, this could be. They look all right in profile, but from directly in front the pylons look too long. (The nacelles are on upside-down, too, which probably doesn't help. :) One thing to keep in mind when weighing these up is that Surprise is rather smaller than Challenger (which is on the humongous side as this style of starship goes); her construction isn't simply a Sovereign dish and warp engines with the secondary hull omitted, the external arrangement is also scaled down by about 30 percent. (I say "external arrangement" because, well, obviously inside the ceilings aren't all 30 percent lower, etc. :) It's pretty much impossible to see without a scale reference, so for purposes of actually making the artwork it doesn't matter, but it should be borne in mind when looking at them. --G. -><- Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Admin Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/ Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam. |
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|
|
Vehrec
Member since Feb-21-09
86 posts |
May-11-09, 05:43 PM (EDT) |
|
10. "RE: Surprise-Class"
In response to message #9
|
>One thing to keep in mind when weighing these up is that >Surprise is rather smaller than Challenger (which is on >the humongous side as this style of starship goes); her construction >isn't simply a Sovereign dish and warp engines with the >secondary hull omitted, the external arrangement is also scaled down >by about 30 percent. (I say "external arrangement" because, well, >obviously inside the ceilings aren't all 30 percent lower, etc. :) >It's pretty much impossible to see without a scale reference, so for >purposes of actually making the artwork it doesn't matter, but it >should be borne in mind when looking at them. > >--G. >-><- >Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Admin >Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/ >Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam. 30% scaled down? Is that by mass or by length? I do not want to think about all the problems that caused for the designer of the thing, given what I know about warship design. Probably involved a divorce, the loss of a good two inches of hairline and the gain of about 10-15 kilos if it was a male. Being put in charge of a major project is apparently a major source of stress, if my sources can be believed. In all seriousness, even if the nacelles are shared the hull would have to be a totally new design. If the nacelles are proportionally scaled down, then you have to shell out more money for a new design and fabrication equipment to make the smaller design, and that doesn't save you any money because the hull still needs to be redesigned to fit the reactor and to resist different stresses than the full-sized design would experience. It might not be quite as big a job as the sister design, but it wouldn't be easy either. “Navigare Necesse Est”-'Get me out of here!' Group Captain Konstantin Vehrec |
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|
|
Gryphon
Charter Member
22428 posts |
May-11-09, 11:13 PM (EDT) |
|
16. "RE: Surprise-Class"
In response to message #10
|
>In all seriousness, even if the nacelles are shared the hull would >have to be a totally new design.Well... yes, but that's what it is. The "it's made of Sovereign parts" thing is just a note to the prop department, as it were - it has no bearing on the in-story realities of the ship's construction, apart from the fact that Sovereign and Surprise share an aesthetic design language, if you will. --G. -><- Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Admin Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/ Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam. |
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
McFortner
Charter Member
564 posts |
May-11-09, 06:00 PM (EDT) |
|
12. "RE: Surprise-Class"
In response to message #9
|
>One thing to keep in mind when weighing these up is that >Surprise is rather smaller than Challenger (which is on >the humongous side as this style of starship goes); her construction >isn't simply a Sovereign dish and warp engines with the >secondary hull omitted, the external arrangement is also scaled down >by about 30 percent. Like this? Michael
| |
Michael C. Fortner RCW #2n+1 "I smoke in moderation. Only one cigar at a time." -- Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|
|
Gryphon
Charter Member
22428 posts |
May-11-09, 11:04 PM (EDT) |
|
15. "RE: Surprise-Class"
In response to message #13
|
>Does it matter all that much that the nacelles are flipped, Gryph? No, I suppose it doesn't, really; doubly so since, the more I look at them, the more inclined I feel to go with the version with the engines on top. --G. -><- Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Admin Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/ Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam. |
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McFortner
Charter Member
564 posts |
May-12-09, 09:26 AM (EDT) |
|
22. "RE: Surprise-Class"
In response to message #6
|
LAST EDITED ON May-12-09 AT 09:42 AM (EDT) > >I dunno but it seems like the warp nacelles are canted a little too >far down compared to the high-nacelle version? I think on the side view they are a little too far down, but compared to the proportions of the Miranda, they are pretty close to the same. A couple of quick comparisons to show you what I mean. Of course, the Surprise is much bigger than a Miranda.... I didn't want to go with the straight down struts because it didn't look as good IMHO. Oh, and here is the first version compared with the Loknar. Not bad considering I didn't really refer to the TMP ships until AFTER I had done the Surprise versions. I did them by eye and adjusted to what looked "right" to me first. Michael
| |
Michael C. Fortner RCW #2n+1 "I smoke in moderation. Only one cigar at a time." -- Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|
|
Gryphon
Charter Member
22428 posts |
May-17-09, 09:28 PM (EDT) |
|
25. "RE: Surprise-Class"
In response to message #24
|
>So, Gryph, any decision on which one you prefer yet? Didn't I say like a week ago? Hmm. No, I guess I didn't, I just said I was leaning that way. My mistake, I could've sworn I followed that up. Anyway, yeah, I like the one with the engines on top better. I had a mental picture that was more Reliant-like, but the marked top-and-bottom asymmetry of the Sovereign-style main hull makes it not really work in practice. Also, upon further review, I think I specified too drastic a scaling-down; at that size she's not that much bigger than a Defiant, and she's supposed to be a frigate to the Sovereign's line-of-battle ship, as it were. I think maybe 75% would be more like it. --G. -><- Benjamin D. Hutchins, Co-Founder, Editor-in-Chief, & Forum Admin Eyrie Productions, Unlimited http://www.eyrie-productions.com/ Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam. |
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|
|
McFortner
Charter Member
564 posts |
May-18-09, 08:25 AM (EDT) |
|
26. "RE: Surprise-Class"
In response to message #25
|
LAST EDITED ON May-18-09 AT 08:50 AM (EDT) >Also, upon further review, I think I specified too drastic a >scaling-down; at that size she's not that much bigger than a >Defiant, and she's supposed to be a frigate to the >Sovereign's line-of-battle ship, as it were. I think maybe 75% >would be more like it. Gryph, using figures I found at http://www.ditl.org and I am thinking 70% may be about right. Look at this comparison image I did up: With the Sovereign Class at 680 meters and a Defiant Class at 170.68 meters, the Surprise Class would come out to be around 380 meters. That would make it longer than a refit Constitution Class at 305 meters. At 75% saucer scale, it would be around 407 meters. What do you think?
| |
Michael C. Fortner RCW #2n+1 "I smoke in moderation. Only one cigar at a time." -- Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|
|
|
version 3.3 © 2001
Eyrie Productions,
Unlimited
Benjamin
D. Hutchins
E P U (Colour)
|